The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB ERA25LA279 · Final report

Beech A23-24 accident near Windham, Connecticut, July 25, 2025

On July 25, 2025 at about 11:40 pm local time, a 1966 Beech A23-24, registered N469JS, was substantially damaged in an accident near Windham, Connecticut (Windham Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s inadequate preflight planning, which resulted in a rejected takeoff and subsequent runway excursion.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 25, 2025 · about 11:40 pm local time
Place
Windham, Connecticut · Windham Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Beech A23-24, built 1966 · all A23-24s on the register
Registration
N469JS · registry record · serial MA-23
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was attempting to depart from a 2,799-ft-long runway. During the takeoff roll, he rejected the takeoff after the airplane had used about 2,100 ft of the runway and had not reached rotation speed. During the rejected takeoff, he reduced power and applied brakes but was unable to stop. The airplane exited the runway and traversed across the grass. He initiated a left turn in an attempt to avoid an airport perimeter fence, but the airplane impacted the fence and came to rest about 260 ft from the departure end of the runway. The airplane’s fuselage was substantially damaged during the accident sequence. The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation and that he should not have attempted to depart from the shorter of the two available runways.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. 301300 during 301
  2. 301230 during 301
  3. 300284 during nose over

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot

Pilot

  • Ratings: single-engine land, none, APLN, none
  • Medical certificate: basicmed
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Maximum gross weight: 2,550 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-360-A2B (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operating certificate: in the vicinity

The flight

  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 18, 2,799 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 260° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 81°C, dew point 75°C
  • Altimeter: 29.9 inHg
  • Observation at 7:52 pm from IJD

Weather report (METAR): KIJD 252352Z AUTO 26004KT 10SM CLR 27/24 A2990 RMK AO2 SLP123 60036 T02720239 10333 20250 51010

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flig1
Passengers1

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The docket at the NTSB holds the report as a PDF and the investigation's photographs and documents. This site never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number ERA25LA279.