The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA25LA137 · Final report

Beech A36TC accident near Lititz, Pennsylvania, March 9, 2025

On March 9, 2025 at about 7:30 pm local time, a 1981 Beech A36TC, registered N347M, was destroyed in an accident during takeoff near Lititz, Pennsylvania (Lancaster airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were seriously injured and 3 people had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to maintain adequate airspeed after takeoff due to his distraction by the opening of the cabin door, which resulted in an exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack and an aerodynamic stall/mush condition at too low of an altitude to recover. Contributing to the accident was the airplane’s overweight condition, which increased its stall speed and adversely affected its control characteristics.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 9, 2025 · about 7:30 pm local time
Place
Lititz, Pennsylvania · Lancaster · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were seriously injured and 3 people had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Beech A36TC, built 1981 · all A36TCs on the register
Registration
N347M · registry record · serial EA-253
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that, during takeoff, he heard a loud “pop” and was unsure what it was. He pulled the throttle back, then realized that the cabin door had opened. He thought that he subsequently pushed the throttle forward but was not sure. He noticed that the airplane’s airspeed was not increasing and immediately looked for a place to land. A passenger stated that the front door opened as soon as the airplane left the ground. She stated that the pilot contacted the air traffic control tower and requested a return to the airport, and the front-seat passenger held the door closed. The airplane turned left and started “shaking” before it impacted the ground. A security camera captured the airplane departing the runway and turning left. As the airplane lost altitude in the turn, the wings were rocking back and forth, and the tail was low, consistent with a mush condition indicative of an impending aerodynamic stall. The airplane impacted the ground and a postimpact fire consumed most of the wreckage, including the cabin door. Based on the circumstance of the accident, the pilot likely became distracted by the opening of the cabin door. Review of weight and balance information revealed that the airplane was loaded about 500 lbs above maximum gross takeoff weight, which would have increased its stall speed, reduced its climb performance, and adversely affected its control characteristics. It is likely that as a combined result of these factors, the pilot allowed the airplane’s airspeed to decay to a point where the airplane encountered an aerodynamic stall.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Aerodynamic stall/spin during initial climb
  2. Loss of control in flight during takeoff defining event
  3. Miscellaneous/other during takeoff

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Weight/balance calculations › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Identification/recognition › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 555 hours in all; 70 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,650 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Rolls Royce M250-B17c (turboprop); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: LNS Lancaster PA at 8:15 pm
  • Destination: SGH Springfield OH
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 26, 6,933 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 300° at 15 knots, gusting 24
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 55°F (13°C), dew point 19°F (-7°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.87 inHg
  • Observation at 3:53 pm from LNS

Weather report (METAR): KLNS 091953Z 30015G24KT 10SM CLR 13/M07 A2987 RMK AO2 PK WND 29027/2002 SLP116 T01331067 56011

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers13

Photographs from the investigation 3 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

7 documents, released by the NTSB on February 11, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.