Cirrus SR22 accident near Jamestown, New York, June 6, 2023
On June 6, 2023 at about 5:52 pm local time, a 2018 Cirrus SR22, registered CGNMT, was destroyed in an accident during initial climb near Jamestown, New York (Chautauqua County/Jamestown Ai airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilots’ failure to maintain airplane control following an anomalous engine indication during the initial climb, which resulted in a loss of control and parachute deployment at an altitude too low for the system to operate effectively. Contributing to the accident was an exceedance of engine manifold air pressure for reasons that could not be determined based on the available evidence.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- June 6, 2023 · about 5:52 pm local time
- Place
- Jamestown, New York · Chautauqua County/Jamestown Ai · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 2 people were killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Cirrus SR22 T, built 2018 · all SR22s on the register
- Registration
- CGNMT · no longer on the register · serial 1814
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The day before the accident, the pilot and the flight instructor brought the airplane to a maintenance facility due to a low engine manifold air pressure (MAP) indication. The owner of the maintenance facility adjusted the MAP via a set screw on the bottom of the slope controller (turbocharger controller), while the instructor performed ground runs to verify it. The instructor then took a facility maintenance technician on a 30-minute post-maintenance flight. There were no anomalies noted during that flight. On the day of the accident, the pilot and instructor flew a cross-country flight to the destination airport. Recorded data indicated that, during the flight, the MAP momentarily exceeded the maximum value of 37.5 in (37.59 in) for 1 second, which activated a red crew alerting system (CAS) message visual warning; however, there were no further exceedances during the flight. After conducting business at the destination, the pilot and instructor boarded the airplane for the return flight. They conducted one uneventful touch-and-go landing when, following the second touch-and-go, about midfield at 200 ft above ground level, the MAP exceeded 38.5 in (39.91 in), which activated an aural CAS warning, and the fuel flow exceeded 41 gph (49.5 gph); however, the engine’s fuel-to-air ratio remained sufficient, and the engine continued to operate. The airplane subsequently pitched up 13° and rolled left 67° just before the Cirrus Aircraft Parachute System (CAPS) was deployed about 293 ft above ground level, which was too low to allow for full deployment of the parachute system. The airplane impacted terrain and was consumed by a postimpact fire. Subsequent examination of the slope controller did not reveal any preimpact mechanical malfunctions; however, it sustained heat damage due to a postcrash fire and its gasket rubber diaphragm were destroyed consistent with heat damage. Examination of the remainder of wreckage also did not reveal any preimpact mechanical malfunctions. Based on the evidence, the pilot(s) likely overreacted to a distracting anomaly in the cockpit (exceedance of MAP, resulting in an aural cockpit CAS warning), lost control of the airplane, and deployed the CAPS at altitude that was insufficient for it to be effective.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control in flight during initial climb defining event
- Miscellaneous/other during initial climb
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Delayed action › Instructor/check pilot
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Pitch control › Not attained/maintained
- Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Attention › Pilot
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Medical certificate: Class 3
- Seat: left
- Injury: fatal
Flight instructor
- Certificate: commercial pilot, private
- Ratings: multi-engine land; multi-engine sea; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 9,650 hours in all
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 344 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, March 7, 2023; 75 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 3,600 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Continental TSIO-550-K (piston); 344 hours total
- Fire on the ground
The flight
- Destination: CYKF Waterloo WI
- Flight plan: VFR
- Runway 31, 4,499 ft by 100 ft
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 360° at 11 knots, gusting 19
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: a few clouds at 4,100 ft
- Temperature: 66°F (19°C), dew point 46°F (8°C)
- Altimeter: 29.83 inHg
- Observation at 1:56 pm from KJHW
Weather report (METAR): KJHW 061756Z AUTO 36011G19KT 10SM FEW041 19/08 A2983
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 2 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
14 documents, released by the NTSB on June 24, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Witness Statements | PDF, 3 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 2 | Memoranda for the Record | PDF, 3 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 3 | Fueling Record | PDF, 1 page · our copy | View Download |
| 4 | Excerpts from Maintenance Records | PDF, 8 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 5 | Excerpt from POH | PDF, 1 page · our copy | View Download |
| 6 | Wreckage Examination | PDF, 3 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 7 | Memoranda for the Record - Component Examinations | PDF, 2 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 8 | Photo Array | PDF, 5 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 9 | Recoverable Data Module - Specialist's Factual Report | PDF, 23 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 10 | Attachment 1 to Recoverable Data Module - Specialist's Factual Report | data file · our copy | Download |
| 11 | Attachment 2 to Recoverable Data Module - Specialist's Factual Report | data file · our copy | Download |
| 12 | Toxicological Reports | PDF, 2 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 13 | Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation | PDF, 10 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 14 | Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 & Evidence Control Forms | PDF, 3 pages · our copy | View Download |
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
