Robinson Helicopter R44 accident near Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, March 26, 2022
On March 26, 2022 at about 9:15 pm local time, a 2000 Robinson Helicopter R44, registered N288L, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Myrtle Beach, South Carolina (Myrtle Beach International Air airport). It was an other work-use flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 4 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
Vibration in the airframe and flight controls for reasons that could not be determined based on the available evidence.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- March 26, 2022 · about 9:15 pm local time
- Place
- Myrtle Beach, South Carolina · Myrtle Beach International Air · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 4 people were on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Robinson Helicopter R44, built 2000 · all R44s on the register
- Registration
- N288L · registry record · serial 0930
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Other work-use flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot and three passengers departed for a short sightseeing tour after the helicopter had flown about 40 preceding tours on the day of the accident. The pilot reported that after takeoff about 500-700 ft above ground level (agl), he experienced a “violent shutter and shaking” of the helicopter flight controls. The pilot described the vibration as “very violent, like a brick in a [clothes] dryer, but three times more violent.” He stated that he noticed the erratic movement of the rpm on the tachometer and that the helicopter was no longer climbing. The pilot entered an autorotation to make an emergency landing in a parking lot. The vibration continued throughout the autorotation all the way to the ground; however, the pilot reported no unusual resistance, binding, or other issues with the flight controls. During the approach, he flared the helicopter and pulled the collective to cushion the landing; the helicopter landed on its skids and slid on the pavement before impacting a mound of dirt and rolling on its left side. The pilot and passengers were not injured and the helicopter sustained substantial damage to the tail boom and fuselage. A postaccident examination of the flight controls and engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The examination of the engine included four successful test runs of the engine. The engine manufacturer had issued a mandatory service bulletin to mitigate an issue with sticking valves. While a stuck valve could not be ruled out, all valves moved freely during the two post-accident examinations, subsequent compression tests were not consistent with an open/stuck valve, and the maintenance records indicated that the manufacturer’s related service bulletin instructions were performed regularly. A “slight” engine vibration was reported during engine warm-up, but it smoothed out during the third and fourth engine runs. The pilot stated that he noted that the helicopter stopped climbing, which would normally associated with a loss of power. However, it’s also possible that when the violent vibrations occurred initially, the pilot inadvertently lowered the collective slightly as he tried to ascertain the reason for the vibrations and the erratic movement of the rpm on the tachometer. He likely interpreted the leveling of the helicopter’s altitude as a loss of power as he entered the autorotation due to the violent vibrations. Based on available evidence, the reason for the vibrations described by the pilot could not be determined.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Off-field or emergency landing during initial climb
- Unknown or undetermined during initial climb defining event
- Hard landing during landing
The NTSB's findings
- Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
Pilot
- Certificate: commercial pilot
- Ratings: rotorcraft: helicopter
- Flight time: 474 hours in all; 400 in this make and model; 163 in the last 90 days; 93 in the last 30 days; 434 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: January 14, 2022
- Medical certificate: Class 1
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 3,234 hours
- Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, February 18, 2022; 83 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 2,400 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming O-540-F1B5 (piston); 3,318 hours total
- Operator: Executive Helicopters INC
The flight
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 290° at 21 knots, gusting 30
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 68°F (20°C), dew point 25°F (-4°C)
- Altimeter: 29.67 inHg
- Observation at 4:56 pm from MYR, 1 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KMYR 262056Z 29021G30KT 10SM CLR 20/M04 A2967 RMK AO2 PK WND 29033/2045 SLP046 T02001044 56020
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flig | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 3 |
About this page
Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The docket at the NTSB holds the report as a PDF and the investigation's photographs and documents. This site never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number ERA22LA168.
