The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA22LA037 · Final report

Piper PA-30 accident near Waverly, Tennessee, October 29, 2021

On October 29, 2021 at about 9:00 pm local time, a 1966 Piper PA-30, registered N30SH, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute near Waverly, Tennessee (Humphrey'S County airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s improper pre-flight fuel planning, which resulted in a total loss of engine power to both engines due to fuel exhaustion.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
October 29, 2021 · about 9:00 pm local time
Place
Waverly, Tennessee · Humphrey'S County · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Piper PA-30, built 1966 · all PA-30s on the register
Registration
N30SH · registry record · serial 30-1262
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot departed on a cross-county flight in his twin-engine airplane and set the fuel selector to the auxiliary tanks. About 7-10 minutes into the flight, the auxiliary tanks ran out of fuel and the pilot switched the fuel selector handles to the main tanks, which the fuel gauge indicated were a ¼-full. The pilot then decided to land and purchase fuel. When the airplane was on a four-mile final approach to the diversion airport, the left engine stopped producing power. About 30 seconds later, the right engine stopped producing power. The pilot was unable to maintain altitude and made a forced landing to a field. The airplane struck a hay bale, which resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage and wings. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed six fuel tanks were intact and empty of fuel. A fuel line fitting to the right auxiliary tank was observed to be loose, stained blue/green, and most likely had been actively leaking fuel. The amount of fuel lost due to this leak could be not determined. The airplane was equipped with three fuel tanks (main, auxiliary and tip tank) in each wing, for a total of 120 gallons total (114 useable). Each tank was independent of each other, so the leak in the right auxiliary fuel tank would have only affected the fuel level in that tank. The pilot reported there was about 55 gallons of fuel onboard when he departed, and the airplane consumed an average of 15 gallons per hour. Based on this information, if the right auxiliary tank (15 gallons total) was empty due to the leak, there still should have been about 40 gallons of fuel onboard (or about 2.6 hours of fuel). The pilot said that he did not visually check the fuel quantity prior to flight because the airplane “…does not have a way to visually check the fuel and know how much fuel you have in the tanks.” However, the Pilot Operating Handbook states, that the pilot should visually check the fuel supply in each tank before flight. As such, even though the pilot thought he had sufficient fuel to complete his flight, postaccident examination of the airplane revealed the fuel tanks were not breached and empty of fuel. A loose fuel line fitting in the right auxiliary fuel tank likely contributed to some unquantifiable loss of fuel from that tank. Had the pilot used the preflight checklist, and visually looked in all six fuel tanks, he would have seen that there was insufficient fuel in all of the tanks to complete the flight. As a result, both engines lost total power due to fuel exhaustion 20 minutes after takeoff, which resulted in a forced landing to field.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel exhaustion during enroute defining event
  2. Loss of engine power (total) during enroute
  3. Loss of engine power (total) during emergency descent
  4. Collision during takeoff/land during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid management
  • Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Not serviced/maintained

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 2,044.6 hours in all; 114.1 in this make and model; 53 in the last 90 days; 17.3 in the last 30 days; 1,893 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: February 12, 2021
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 5,662 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, October 8, 2021
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,600 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Lycoming IO-320-B1A (piston); 5,696 hours total
  • Engine 2: Lycoming IO-320-B1A (piston); 5,696 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: XNX Gallatin TN at 8:40 pm
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 250° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 6 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 700 ft
  • Temperature: 54°F (12°C), dew point 52°F (11°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.51 inHg
  • Observation at 3:55 pm from KM02, 15 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KM02 292055Z AUTO 25005KT 6SM BR BKN007 BKN013 BKN022 12/11 A2951

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

5 documents, released by the NTSB on September 7, 2023. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.