The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA22LA019 · Final report

Beech 200 accident near Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, October 18, 2021

On October 18, 2021 at about 8:16 pm local time, a 1976 Beech 200, registered N996LM, was substantially damaged in an accident during taxi (to runway) near Mount Pleasant, South Carolina (Mt Pleasant Rgnl-Faison Fld airport). It was an other work-use flight under charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135). No one was hurt; 8 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to maintain clearance with the parked fuel truck while taxiing for takeoff. Contributing to the outcome was the pilot’s decision to park the airplane in the congested ramp area and his excessive taxi speed.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
October 18, 2021 · about 8:16 pm local time
Place
Mount Pleasant, South Carolina · Mt Pleasant Rgnl-Faison Fld · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 8 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Beech 200, built 1976 · all 200s on the register
Registration
N996LM · no longer on the register · serial BB-157
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Other work-use flight · charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The twin-engine, turbo-propeller-powered business airplane was taxiing for takeoff when the right wing struck a fuel truck that was parked on a concrete pad between the ramp and a hangar. The outboard section of the wing sustained substantial damage. The pilot reported that he was aware of the fuel truck that was parked less than 20 ft from the ramp taxiway line and assessed that he had enough room to get around it. No safety markings or cones were around the fuel truck, and no marshaling assistance or warnings were provided by the fixed base operator. He stated that after he started to taxi, he noticed a single-engine airplane to his immediate left, pulling into the spot adjacent to his airplane and that the single-engine airplane kept inching forward. The pilot stated he “shallowed out” his left turn to avoid contact with the airplane located about 6 ft from his left wingtip, as it was apparent to him that the pilot was not going to stop. He stated that this short hesitation, and probably 6 ft of movement, resulted in the right-wing tip of his airplane to contact the fuel truck. According to the occupants of the single-engine airplane, they were taxiing and stopped about 30 yards short of the accident airplane. As the accident airplane’s passenger door closed, they continued their taxi and parked directly on the intended yellow parking “T,” with the main wheel directly on the line of the “T.” As they finalized the shutdown procedure, they observed the accident airplane taxiing very quickly away from its parking space. As the airplane taxied away, its left wing came within 3 ft of the stationary propeller of their airplane. Review of security camera videos confirmed the single-engine airplane was parked for about 1 minute and 19 seconds before the accident airplane began to taxi. Review of a postaccident photograph also showed that the single-engine airplane was parked normally in the parking spot. Calculations of the accident airplane’s movement based on the security camera video indicated that the accident airplane traveled about 112 ft during the taxi out before striking the fuel truck with the right wing. The airplane’s taxi speed was calculated to have reached maximum of about 12.7 mph during its movement. According to personnel at the Fixed Base Operator (FBO), the pilot was not parked in an area that was designated for extended parking for airplanes of its size. FBO personnel stated they had spoken to the pilot in the past about the ramp congestion and the reasons why they insisted he park his airplane in the middle on the taxiway line. In the 2 to 3 months before the accident, he had pulled through the tiedown spots they reserved for smaller airplanes, taking up two tiedown spots with the accident airplane. The ramp congestion, with accident airplane, vehicle, and foot traffic was not unusual for the airport and the pilot had also experienced this firsthand during his many visits to the airport. Given this information, the pilot failed to maintain clearance with the fuel truck as he taxied the airplane on the congested ramp. It likely that had he parked the airplane in a less congested location, or taxied the airplane at a lower speed, the accident could have been avoided.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Ground collision during taxi (to runway) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Ground vehicle › Decision related to condition
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Surface speed/braking › Not attained/maintained

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 5,800 hours in all; 1,300 in this make and model; 165 in the last 90 days; 90 in the last 30 days; 5,500 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: October 5, 2021
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: no injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Medical certificate: Unknown
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: no injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: no injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: no injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 11,928 hours
  • Last inspection: approved inspection programme, August 17, 2021
  • Maximum gross weight: 12,500 lb
  • Seats: 11
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: P&W Canada PT6A-42 (turboprop); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: P&W Canada PT6A-42 (turboprop); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Austin Aviation

The flight

  • Departed from: LRO Mount Pleasant SC at 8:20 pm
  • Destination: CUB Columbia SC
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 9 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 43°F (6°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.11 inHg
  • Observation at 4:15 pm from KLRO

Weather report (METAR): KLRO 182015Z AUTO 00000KT 9SM CLR 23/06 A3011 RMK AO2

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2
Passengers6

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

7 documents, released by the NTSB on November 8, 2023. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 PDF, 9 pages View Download
2 Witness Statements and Interview Summaries PDF, 14 pages View Download
3 Memorandums for Record - Information Provided by FAA PDF, 4 pages View Download
4 Load Manifest PDF, 1 page View Download
5 Photo Array PDF, 9 pages View Download
6 Klro - Hangar Rooftop Security Camera ASF file Download
7 Klro - Parking Apron Security Camera ASF file Download

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.