The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA18FA148 · Final report

Piper PA34 accident near Bennington, Vermont, May 20, 2018

On May 20, 2018 at about 6:23 pm local time, a 1975 Piper PA34, registered N1101X, was destroyed in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Bennington, Vermont. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's improper decision to attempt a visual flight rules flight in instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in a loss of control during a turn.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 20, 2018 · about 6:23 pm local time
Place
Bennington, Vermont · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA34 200T, built 1975 · all PA34s on the register
Registration
N1101X · no longer on the register · serial 34-7570208
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

After receiving commercial and flight instructor certificates with a designated pilot examiner (DPE), the instrument-rated commercial pilot planned to fly back to his home airport the following day. The DPE reviewed weather with the pilot and advised him to delay the flight 2 days due to poor weather; however, the following day, the pilot attempted the visual flight rules flight in instrument meteorological conditions with mountain obscuration. Before departing on the flight, the pilot received three weather briefings and all three contained information regarding instrument flight rules conditions with mountain obscuration. The pilot was receiving flight following services from air traffic control, while proceeding southeast, in clouds, below the minimum vectoring altitude, near mountainous terrain. The controller suggested a westbound turn for lower terrain and continued radar coverage. The airplane briefly turned to a westbound heading, then turned back to a southeast heading. About 4 miles later, the controller again advised the pilot that, if he continued on the present heading, radar coverage would be lost. The pilot asked again what heading he should fly and the controller responded westbound, to which the pilot responded, "westbound heading 270." Radar and radio contact were lost during the second westbound turn. The last radar target indicated an altitude of 3,500 ft msl and groundspeed of 218 knots about 1,000 ft from the accident site, which was located at an elevation about 2,625 ft msl. Examination of the accident site revealed a 60-ft debris path on a 265° course through trees, consistent with a 45° nose-down attitude at impact. Examination of the wreckage did not reveal any preimpact mechanical malfunctions. The pilot had entered clouds and was trying to fly clear of clouds. The conditions were conducive to the development of spatial disorientation; however, the extent to which spatial disorientation played a role could not be determined as the descent could have also been the result of an uncoordinated turn or distraction.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. VFR encounter with IMC during enroute (cruise)
  2. Loss of control in flight during enroute (cruise) defining event
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Below VFR minima › Decision related to condition

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 256 hours in all; 30 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: May 19, 2018
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 7,603 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, September 30, 2017
  • Maximum gross weight: 4,570 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Cont Motor TSIO-360-EB (piston); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Cont Motor LTSIO-360-EB (piston); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: BTV Burlington VT at 5:45 pm
  • Destination: OXC Oxford CT
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 230° at 8 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 3,600 ft; a few clouds at 1,700 ft
  • Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 63°F (17°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.90 inHg
  • Observation at 6:15 pm from DDH, 5 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

7 documents, released by the NTSB on September 19, 2019. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Interview Summaries PDF, 2 pages View Download
2 Fuel Receipt PDF, 1 page View Download
3 Excerpts from Pilot Applications PDF, 2 pages View Download
4 Aircraft Status Sheet PDF, 1 page View Download
5 Weather Report PDF, 1 page View Download
6 radar Data spreadsheet Download
7 Photo Array PDF, 6 pages View Download

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.