Piper PA 28-236 accident near Punta Gorda, Florida, June 17, 2016
On June 17, 2016 at about 9:09 pm local time, a 1980 Piper PA 28-236, registered N8161X, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (landing roll) near Punta Gorda, Florida (Punta Gorda airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The tower controller’s failure to identify and mitigate jet blast from an airplane conducting an engine test run, and the effect of the jet blast on landing traffic, which resulted in a runway excursion when a landing airplane encountered the blast. Contributing to the accident was the lack of procedures for positioning high-powered airplanes conducting engine test runs in the airport movement area.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- June 17, 2016 · about 9:09 pm local time
- Place
- Punta Gorda, Florida · Punta Gorda · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Piper PA 28-236 236, built 1980 · all PA 28-236s on the register
- Registration
- N8161X · registry record · serial 28-8011076
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The private pilot stated that, during the landing roll, the airplane suddenly departed the left side of the 150-ft-wide runway into the grass, resulting in substantial damage to the left wing. The pilot initially thought a tire had blown, but when he exited the airplane, he noticed a McDonnell-Douglas MD-83 parked on the movement area of the adjacent taxiway performing a maintenance test run of its engines and realized he had been blown off the runway. Before the accident, the tower controller had cleared the MD-83 to position itself in the movement area adjacent to the landing runway; the positioning resulted in the engine and resultant exhaust being directed toward the landing area of the runway. The controllers did not warn the accident pilot about the MD-83 and its purpose on the taxiway, as required per FAA policy. Additionally, the local procedures for positioning transport category airplanes to do engine test runs was not formally documented, and the informal procedure in use at the time of the accident did not adequately protect aircraft operating on the airport from jet blast. The estimated idle jet engine exhaust velocity of the MD-83 was 35 knots. Combined with the prevailing wind, the estimated sudden right quartering headwind acting on the accident airplane would have been about 39 knots. As a result of this investigation, the air traffic control tower and airport authority developed and disseminated procedures for conducting high-power engine test runs in the movement area of the airport.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Prop/jet/rotor blast/suction during landing (landing roll)
- Loss of control on ground during landing (landing roll) defining event
- Runway excursion during landing (landing roll)
The NTSB's findings
- cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Communication (personnel) › Lack of communication › ATC personnel
- cause Environmental issues › Operating environment › Air traffic/operating proc › ATC clearance procedure › Awareness of condition
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Attain/maintain not possible
- factor Organizational issues › Management › Policy/procedure › Availability of policy/proc › Airport
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Flight time: 344 hours in all; 211 in this make and model; 45 in the last 90 days; 9 in the last 30 days
- Last flight review: January 10, 2015
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 2,821.9 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, October 7, 2015; 78 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 3,000 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming 0-540 SERIES (piston); 2,900 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: TPF Tampa FL at 9:30 pm
- Destination: PGD Punta Gorda FL
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 22, 7,193 ft by 150 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 270° at 9 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: a few clouds at 7,500 ft
- Temperature: 82°F (28°C), dew point 73°F (23°C)
- Altimeter: 29.97 inHg
- Observation at 8:53 pm from PGD
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 2 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
7 documents, released by the NTSB on June 21, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Air Traffic Control | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Air Traffic Control - Factual Report Attachment (1) | PDF, 13 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Air Traffic Control - Factual Report Attachment (2) | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Letter of Agreement - Punta Gorda Atct and Punta Gorda Airport | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 6 | Photos | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 7 | Airplane Video Footage | MOV file | Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
