The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB ERA14FA459 · Final report

Cessna 172M and amateur-built SEAREY mid-air collision near Lancaster, New York, September 27, 2014

On September 27, 2014 at about 2:20 pm local time, 2 aircraft, Cessna 172M (N9679H) and amateur-built SEAREY (N89KD), were involved in a mid-air collision near Lancaster, New York (Buffalo-Lancaster Rgnl airport). 2 people were killed; 2 others were unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to maintain an adequate visual lookout for known traffic in the fly-in event traffic pattern, which resulted in a midair collision.
The other airplane pilot’s failure to maintain an adequate visual lookout for known traffic in the fly-in event traffic pattern, which resulted in a midair collision.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 27, 2014 · about 2:20 pm local time
Place
Lancaster, New York · Buffalo-Lancaster Rgnl · map
Type
Accident · mid-air collision
Injuries
2 people were killed; 2 others were unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft 1
Cessna 172M, built 1975 · all 172Ms on the register
Registration
N9679H · no longer on the register · serial 17266308
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
Aircraft 2
Amateur-built SEAREY, built 2014
Registration
N89KD · registry record · serial 1LK588C
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative for the Cessna 172M final · quoted from the NTSB record

The accident airplanes, a Cessna and an experimental amateur-built Searey, were two of several airplanes participating in a volunteer event designed to provide the opportunity for young people to fly in a general aviation airplane. A route of flight for the event was established and briefed, and the pilots were instructed to make position reports over the airport's common traffic advisory frequency at certain landmarks along the route of flight; however, no procedures were in place to account for the disparate operating characteristics and speeds of the aircraft participating in the event. Radar and GPS data showed that the Cessna overtook and descended to the altitude of the Searey as the Searey climbed slowly. During the last moments before impact, both airplanes were depicted at the same altitude and in close lateral proximity. The Searey pilot was unaware that his airplane had collided with the Cessna, but upon experiencing control difficulty, performed a forced landing to an area of thick vegetation. The Searey was substantially damaged during the landing. Immediately after the collision, the Cessna entered a descending spiral to ground contact. A performance radar and cockpit visibility study determined that the Searey would have remained a relatively small and stationary object in the Cessna's windscreen, appearing below the horizon and just above the engine cowling, for several minutes before the impact. The study also determined that the Searey may have been difficult to distinguish against the background of terrain. Additionally, since the airplanes were on a converging course, the Searey would have presented little relative motion to the other pilot, making detection more difficult. The Cessna would not have been visible to the Searey pilot because it approached from an area that was obstructed by the airplane's structure.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The NTSB's narrative for the amateur-built SEAREY final · quoted from the NTSB record

The accident airplanes, a Cessna and an experimental amateur-built Searey, were two of several airplanes participating in a volunteer event designed to provide the opportunity for young people to fly in a general aviation airplane. A route of flight for the event was established and briefed, and the pilots were instructed to make position reports over the airport's common traffic advisory frequency at certain landmarks along the route of flight; however, no procedures were in place to account for the disparate operating characteristics and speeds of the aircraft participating in the event. Radar and GPS data showed that the Cessna overtook and descended to the altitude of the Searey as the Searey climbed slowly. During the last moments before impact, both airplanes were depicted at the same altitude and in close lateral proximity. The Searey pilot was unaware that his airplane had collided with the Cessna, but upon experiencing control difficulty, performed a forced landing to an area of thick vegetation. The Searey was substantially damaged during the landing. Immediately after the collision, the Cessna entered a descending spiral to ground contact. A performance radar and cockpit visibility study determined that the Searey would have remained a relatively small and stationary object in the Cessna's windscreen, appearing below the horizon and just above the engine cowling, for several minutes before the impact. The study also determined that the Searey may have been difficult to distinguish against the background of terrain. Additionally, since the airplanes were on a converging course, the Searey would have presented little relative motion to the other pilot, making detection more difficult. The Cessna would not have been visible to the Searey pilot because it approached from an area that was obstructed by the airplane's structure.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record for the Cessna 172M from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Midair collision during maneuvering defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring other aircraft › Pilot of other aircraft

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,115 hours in all; 1,000 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 8,069 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 25, 2014; 145 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,299 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-320 SERIES (piston); 145 hours total
  • Operator: Western New York Flying Club INC

The flight

  • Departed from: BQR Lancaster NY at 2:12 pm
  • Destination: BQR Lancaster NY
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 08, 3,199 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 63°F (17°C), dew point 55°F (13°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.31 inHg
  • Observation at 2:54 pm from BUF, 5 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

The factual record for the amateur-built SEAREY from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Midair collision during maneuvering defining event
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring other aircraft › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 4,272 hours in all; 860 in this make and model; 50 in the last 90 days; 25 in the last 30 days; 4,210 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 160 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, January 13, 2014; 160 hours since
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rotax 914 (SERIES) (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Fly Away INC

The flight

  • Departed from: BQR Lancaster NY at 2:09 pm
  • Destination: BQR Lancaster NY
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 08, 3,199 ft by 75 ft

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number ERA14FA459.