The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA10CA057 · Final report

Cessna 172S accident near Summit, Delaware, November 7, 2009

On November 7, 2009 at about 5:00 pm local time, a Cessna 172S, registered N134B, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff near Summit, Delaware (Summit Airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The student pilot’s failure to maintain directional control during takeoff.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
November 7, 2009 · about 5:00 pm local time
Place
Summit, Delaware · Summit Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172S · all 172Ss on the register
Registration
N134B · registry record · serial 172S9345
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The student pilot stated that he was performing a solo touch-and-go landing. After touchdown, he applied full throttle and the airplane began swerving left and right. He aborted the takeoff and attempted to regain directional control before departing off the left side of the runway. The airplane continued traveling in the grass and the nosewheel struck a depression just prior to a paved taxiway, damaging the nose landing gear and firewall.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control on ground during takeoff defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during takeoff (rejected takeoff)
  3. Runway excursion during takeoff (rejected takeoff)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 37 hours in all; 37 in this make and model; 11 in the last 90 days; 2 in the last 30 days; 3 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 2,185 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, October 12, 2009; 64 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,550 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-360-L2A (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Deleware Aviation Center

The flight

  • Departed from: ILG Wilmington DE at 4:30 pm
  • Destination: EVY Summit DE
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 17, 4,488 ft by 65 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 200° at 10 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 54°F (12°C), dew point 30°F (-1°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.26 inHg
  • Observation at 3:51 pm from ILG, 11 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.