The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA09LA529 · Final report

Bombardier INC DHC-8-202 accident near Sterling, Virginia, August 29, 2009

On August 29, 2009, a Bombardier INC DHC-8-202, registered N367PH, was substantially damaged in an accident near Sterling, Virginia (Unknown airport). It was flown under scheduled airline rules (Part 121). The NTSB record does not give the injuries.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Undetermined.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 29, 2009 · cases in 2009
Place
Sterling, Virginia · Unknown · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
The NTSB record does not give the injuries.
Weather
not recorded
Aircraft
Bombardier INC DHC-8-202
Registration
N367PH · registry record · serial 511
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight · scheduled airline rules (Part 121)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

On an unknown date and at an unknown time, the airplane sustained substantial damage to the bottom of the fuselage tail section. The damage was found during a maintenance C-check inspection on August 29, 2009. The damage was found when maintenance personnel were inspecting the inside of the tail section and noticed bowing and bending in the support structure and damage to nearby rivets. The damage was consistent with tail strike damage and had resulted in a puncture of the pressure vessel of the airplane. According to the maintenance task cards for different inspections of the airplane, an exterior inspection was to be completed prior to any other work. At least three exterior inspections were completed within the weeks preceding the discovery of the damage, including the inspection in which the damage was discovered. Each inspection required examination of the damaged area. Because maintenance personnel likely missed the damage during these inspections, pilots performing preflight checks of the airplane would be just as likely to miss the damage. Due to the height of the damage personnel would likely need to bend down in order to see it.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Abnormal runway contact during unknown defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined

Crew member

No details recorded.

Crew member

No details recorded.

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 23,810 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, August 21, 2009
  • Seats: 40
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: P&W Canada PW123 (turboprop); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: P&W Canada PW123 (turboprop); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Champlain Enterprises INC

The flight

  • Departed from: UNK Unknown
  • Destination: UNK Unknown
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Temperature: 0°F (-18°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

9 documents, released by the NTSB on December 7, 2010. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/ERA09LA529.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.