The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DFW06CA176 · Final report

Cessna 210A accident near Denver City, Texas, July 7, 2006

On July 7, 2006 at about 10:25 pm local time, a Cessna 210A, registered N9419X, was substantially damaged in an accident near Denver City, Texas (Denver City Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The loss of engine power for undetermined reasons. A contributing factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 7, 2006 · about 10:25 pm local time
Place
Denver City, Texas · Denver City Airport
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 210A · all 210As on the register
Registration
N9419X · no longer on the register · serial 21057719
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

A 2,350-hour commercial pilot completed a 393-nautical mile cross-country flight, and was preparing to land at his destination airport when he experienced a total loss of engine power while on final approach. The single-engine airplane landed short of the 3,960-foot long runway, slid, and came to rest about 100 feet short of the runway threshold. An FAA inspector, who examined the airplane, reported that the engine firewall was wrinkled and confirmed that there was fuel present in the left fuel tank. He added that witnesses reported observing fuel draining from the right wing after the accident. The pilot reported that the power loss was the result of a faulty fuel pump. Examination of the fuel pump and engine by an airframe and power plant mechanic did not reveal any anomalies or mechanical deficiencies. The reason for the loss of engine power could not be determined.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,350 hours in all; 10 in this make and model; 173 in the last 90 days; 62 in the last 30 days; 2,292 as pilot in command; 1,370 on instruments
  • Last flight review: August 1, 2005
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 31,769.7 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, September 1, 2005; 118.3 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,900 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Continental IO-470-E (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: RVS Tulsa OK at 7:25 pm
  • Destination: E57 Denver City TX
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 08, 3,960 ft by 45 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Temperature: 0°F (-18°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.