The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DCA22LA212 · Final report

Airbus A330-243 incident near Los Angeles, California, September 22, 2022

On September 22, 2022 at about 7:00 pm local time, a 2013 Airbus A330-243, registered N393HA, was involved in an incident during enroute (climb to cruise) near Los Angeles, California. It was flown under scheduled airline rules (Part 121). No one was hurt; 290 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Uncommanded movement of the trimmable horizontal stabilizer control wheel for reasons that could not be determined based on the available evidence.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 22, 2022 · about 7:00 pm local time
Place
Los Angeles, California · map
Type
Incident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 290 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Airbus A330-243, built 2013 · all A330-243s on the register
Registration
N393HA · registry record · serial 1422
Damage
Not recorded
Flight
Flight · scheduled airline rules (Part 121)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The flight crew reported that, when the airplane climbed through flight level 360, the trimmable horizontal stabilizer (THS) trim wheel began to move “very quickly” forward and aft, creating small pitching oscillations. No message appeared on the airplane’s electronic centralized aircraft monitor, and no flight deck alerts annunciated. The crew decided to turn off the autopilot to isolate the malfunction. However, when the autopilot was off, the trim wheel continued to move erratically. The crew then reengaged the autopilot, and small pitch oscillations resumed. These oscillations, which were below the threshold to trigger a fault, were partially countered by flight control system inputs, but the trim wheel continued its uncommanded movement. The first officer (the pilot flying) then turned off the autopilot and manually flew the airplane for the rest of the flight while the captain (the pilot monitoring) managed the situation. The flight crew contacted air traffic control to declare an emergency and advise that fuel would need to be jettisoned before the airplane returned to the airport. Afterward, fuel was jettisoned until the airplane reached its maximum landing weight. The airplane landed uneventfully, and the emergency was terminated after landing. The airplane’s Post Flight Report information showed the “PITCH TRIM ACTR [actuator] OVERRIDE SWITCH” fault message. The maintenance crew at the airport replaced the pitch trim actuator (a subcomponent of the THS actuator), and an operational test of the THS actuator was successful. One possible scenario for the uncommanded pitch trim wheel movement involved a failure or malfunction of a subcomponent of the THS actuator (the No. 1 digital electronic module, which digitizes the analog signals from THS position sensors. Extensive testing of the THS actuator and its subcomponents, including the incident pitch trim actuator and the No. 1 digital electronic module, was conducted at the manufacturers’ facilities. However, the testing did not identify the specific reason for the uncommanded pitch trim wheel movements during the incident flight. As a result, the investigation was unable to determine the cause of the anomaly based on the available evidence. It is important to note that this investigation found that the anomaly appeared to be isolated to components that were either removed and repaired or replaced on the incident airplane. Further, the incident airplane had no pitch or pitch trim flight control faults related to the circumstances of this incident since the THS actuator was removed and replaced in November 2022.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Flight control sys malf/fail during enroute (climb to cruise) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › Stabilizer control system › Unknown/Not determined

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot, flight engineer
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: glider
  • Flight time: 14,382 hours in all; 3,380 in this make and model; 88 in the last 90 days; 33 in the last 30 days; 8,063 as pilot in command; 0 on instruments
  • Last flight review: March 2, 2022
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor
  • Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 3,117 hours in all; 248 in this make and model; 226 in the last 90 days; 67 in the last 30 days; 1,381 as pilot in command; 526 on instruments
  • Last flight review: June 22, 2022
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Pilot-Rated Passenger

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Flight time: 9,000 hours in all
  • Seat: ctr
  • Injury: no injuries

Other crew

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Flight time: 6,500 hours in all
  • Seat: rear
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,610 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, September 22, 2022
  • Maximum gross weight: 524,700 lb
  • Seats: 293
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Rolls-Royc RR772B-60 (turbofan); 34,511 hours total
  • Engine 2: Rolls-Royc RR772B-60 (turbofan); 36,076 hours total
  • Operator: Hawaiian Airlines

The flight

  • Departed from: LAX Los Angeles CA at 6:00 pm
  • Destination: HNL Honolulu HI
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 0°F (-18°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew12
Passengers278

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

4 documents, released by the NTSB on September 19, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 PDF, 11 pages View Download
2 Flight Crew Statements PDF, 12 pages View Download
3 Video - Ths Pitch Trim Wheel Uncommanded Movement 3GP file Download
4 Aircraft Systems Group Chairman's Factual Report PDF, 20 pages View Download

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Other NTSB records under N393HA the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2022-12-18DCA23LA096 · accident near Kahului, HI · minor damage · serious injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.