The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DCA05MA095 · Final report

Boeing 747-200 accident near Agana, August 19, 2005

On August 19, 2005 at about 2:18 pm local time, a Boeing 747-200, registered N627US, was substantially damaged in an accident near Agana (Guam-Antonio B. Won Pat airport). It was flown under scheduled airline rules (Part 121). 2 people had minor injuries; 338 others were unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

the flight crews' failure to verify that the number of landing gear annunciations on the second officer’s panel was consistent with the number specified in the abnormal/emergency procedures checklist, which led to a landing with the nose gear retracted.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 19, 2005 · about 2:18 pm local time
Place
Agana · Guam-Antonio B. Won Pat
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people had minor injuries; 338 others were unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Boeing 747-200 · all 747-200s on the register
Registration
N627US · no longer on the register · serial 21709
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight · scheduled airline rules (Part 121)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During the initial approach, the red GEAR annunciator light above the gear lever illuminated, and the landing gear warning horn sounded after the gear handle was selected down and the flaps were selected to 25 degrees. During the go-around, the captain asked the second officer (SO), "what do you have for the gear lights?" The SO responded, "four here." When all gear are down and locked on the Boeing 747-200, the landing gear indication module located on the SO’s instrument panel has five green lights: one nose gear light above four main landing gear lights. The crew then read through the "Red Gear Light Remains On (After Gear Extension)" emergency/abnormal procedure from the cockpit operations manual to troubleshoot the problem. Although the checklist twice presented in boldface type that five lights must be present for the gear to be considered down and locked, the crew did not verbalize the phrase either time. The captain did not directly request a count, and the SO did not verbally confirm, the number of gear down annunciator lights that were illuminated; instead, the flight crew made only general comments regarding the gear, such as "all gear," "all green," or "got 'em all." Because the crew believed that all of the gear annunciator lights were illuminated, they considered all gear down and locked and decided not to recycle the landing gear or attempt to extend any of the gear via the alternate systems before attempting a second approach. During all communications with air traffic control, the flight crew did not specify the nature of the problem that they were troubleshooting. Although the checklist did not authorize a low flyby, if the flight crewmembers had verbalized that they had a gear warning, the controller most likely would have been able to notify the crew of the nose gear position before the point at which a go-around was no longer safe. Multiple gear cycles were conducted after the accident, and the nose gear extended each time with all nose gear door and downlock indications correctly displayed on the landing gear indication module. Postaccident examination of the nose gear door actuator found that one of the two lock keys was installed 180 degrees backward. Although this improper configuration could prevent proper extension of the nose gear, the actuator had been installed on the accident airplane since 2001 after the actuator was overhauled by the operator. No anomalies were found with the landing gear indication module, the nose gear-operated door sequence valve, and the nose/body landing gear selector valve.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 7,850 hours in all; 7,850 in this make and model; 184 in the last 90 days; 86 in the last 30 days; 2,350 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: April 20, 2004
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot, flight engineer
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 9,100 hours in all; 8,695 in this make and model; 208 in the last 90 days; 75 in the last 30 days
  • Last flight review: March 23, 2005
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Flight Engineer

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot, flight engineer
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 8,720 hours in all; 345 in this make and model; 163 in the last 90 days; 100 in the last 30 days; 4,110 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rear
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 95,270 hours
  • Last inspection: approved inspection programme
  • Maximum gross weight: 816,000 lb
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7Q (turbofan); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7Q (turbofan); 0 hours total
  • Engine 3: Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7Q (turbofan); 0 hours total
  • Engine 4: Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7Q (turbofan); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: RJAA Tokyo
  • Destination: PGUM Agana
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 06L, 10,015 ft by 150 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 350° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 2,500 ft
  • Temperature: 84°F (29°C), dew point 77°F (25°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.82 inHg

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew115
Passengers1323

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.