The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN26LA330 · Preliminary: the investigation is not finished

Cessna 152 accident near Bolingbrook, Illinois, September 29, 2026

On September 29, 2026 at about 11:28 pm local time, a 1978 Cessna 152, registered N69009, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Bolingbrook, Illinois (Bolingbrook'S Clow Intl airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The NTSB has not yet published a probable cause for this accident. Investigations usually take one to two years; this page updates when the final report is released.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 29, 2026 · about 11:28 pm local time · cases in 2026
Place
Bolingbrook, Illinois · Bolingbrook'S Clow Intl · cases near this airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 152 II, built 1978 · all 152s on the register
Registration
N69009 · registry record · serial 15282429
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative preliminary · quoted from the NTSB record

On September 29, 2026, about 1828 central daylight time, a Cessna 152 II airplane, N69009, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident near Bolingbrook, Illinois. The flight instructor and the student pilot sustained minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight. The purpose of the local area flight was for the flight instructor to provide instruction to the student pilot, as part of JWA Flight School. JWA Flight School is based at the Bolingbrook’s Clow International Airport (1C5), Bolingbrook, Illinois. The airplane had a preflight inspection performed by both the flight instructor and the student pilot, and no abnormalities were noted. The student pilot was stationed in the left front seat, and the flight instructor was stationed in the right front seat. The airplane had about 24.5 gallons of 100 low lead fuel onboard for the flight. The engine runup process was completed and no abnormalities were noted. During the initial climb from runway 18 at 1C5, the student pilot who was manipulating the flight controls noted that “something was not right.” The flight instructor then immediately assumed the flight controls. She observed the tachometer and noticed that the engine RPM had decreased to about 20 RPM. She then executed the emergency procedure checklist and realized the airplane did not have sufficient engine power to climb due to the partial power loss, and the airplane was losing altitude. She performed a forced landing to a flat grass sports field in a residential area, about 0.25 miles southwest of the departure end of runway 18. The airplane came to rest upright in a nose-down profile on the grass field. During the impact sequence, the empennage separated about midspan. The student pilot was able to egress from the airplane on his own accord; however, the flight instructor was removed from the airplane by a bystander. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage, both wings, and the empennage. The airplane was recovered from the accident site and transported to a secure location for future examination. The airplane was manufactured in 1978. The airplane was equipped with a Lycoming Engines O-235-L2C reciprocating engine and a McCauley Propeller 1A103/TCM6958 fixed-pitch two-blade aluminum propeller. A review of the airplane’s maintenance records showed that an annual inspection was performed by a mechanic on July 23, 2026, for the airframe, the engine, and the propeller. Since the annual inspection occurred, the airplane had accumulated 40.9 hours. At the time of the accident, the airplane had accumulated a total of 14,851.9 hours. The flight instructor completed a flight review on April 24, 2025.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (partial) during initial climb defining event

The aircraft

  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Operator: Jwa Flight School LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: 1C5 Bolingbrook IL at 11:27 pm
  • Destination: 1C5 Bolingbrook IL
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 18/3, 3,360 ft by 75 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 160° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 52°F (11°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.93 inHg
  • Observation at 5:45 pm from KLOT, 6 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KLOT 292245Z 16005KT 10SM CLR 23/11 A2993

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The NTSB has not released the docket for this case yet. The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), is usually released when the investigation is nearly complete, and the list here is refreshed when it appears. Check at the NTSB.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/CEN26LA330.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.