The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN25LA171 · Final report

Piper PA28 accident near South Saint Paul, Minnesota, May 5, 2025

On May 5, 2025 at about 10:55 pm local time, a 1964 Piper PA28, registered N7951W, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near South Saint Paul, Minnesota (South St Paul Muni/Richard E F airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The student pilot’s inadvertent brake application during the touchdown, that resulted in abnormal runway contact and a loss of directional control. Contributing to the accident was the flight instructor’s inadequate supervision of the student pilot during the landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 5, 2025 · about 10:55 pm local time
Place
South Saint Paul, Minnesota · South St Paul Muni/Richard E F · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA28 180, built 1964 · all PA28s on the register
Registration
N7951W · registry record · serial 28-1998
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During the instructional flight, the airplane was landing to the runway with the student pilot operating the flight controls. Upon touchdown, the airplane “swerved hard to the left.” The flight instructor immediately announced, “my controls” and he attempted to maintain directional control. He reported the loss of directional control happened “so fast” and that he was unable to recover the airplane. After the accident, the student pilot reported that he “may have had his feet on the brakes” upon touchdown. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the engine mount, with a bend in a truss tube. The flight instructor reported there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airframe or the engine that would have precluded normal operation. The flight instructor further reported that in the future, he will be having new student pilots announce, “heels on the floor” during the landing flare, to prevent inadvertent brake application.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Attempted remediation/recovery during landing (flare/touchdown)
  2. Abnormal runway contact during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event
  3. Loss of control on ground during landing (flare/touchdown)

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Student/instructed pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Surface speed/braking › Incorrect use/operation
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring other person › Instructor/check pilot

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot, flight engineer
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 16,500 hours in all; 122 in this make and model; 26 in the last 90 days; 26 in the last 30 days; 7,000 as pilot in command; 1,600 on instruments
  • Last flight review: July 19, 2024
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 10 hours in all; 5 in this make and model; 10 in the last 90 days
  • Last flight review: May 5, 2025
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 5,421 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 30, 2025; 6 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,400 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming Engines O-360 (piston); 1,119 hours total

The flight

  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 16/3, 4,002 ft by 100 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 150° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 75°F (24°C), dew point 34°F (1°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.96 inHg
  • Observation at 5:55 pm from KSGS

Weather report (METAR): KSGS 052255Z AUTO 15005KT 10SM CLR 24/01 A2996 RMK AO2 T02440011

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Photographs from the investigation 4 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

2 documents, released by the NTSB on June 20, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 PDF, 10 pages View Download
2 Accident Photographs PDF, 5 pages · our copy View Download

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.