The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN24LA108 · Final report

Piper PA-28-180 accident near Conway, Arkansas, January 31, 2024

On January 31, 2024 at about 11:22 pm local time, a 1971 Piper PA-28-180, registered N2184T, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern downwind) near Conway, Arkansas (Conway Regional Airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The student pilot's improper movement of the fuel selector to the OFF position, which resulted in fuel starvation and a total loss of engine power.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 31, 2024 · about 11:22 pm local time
Place
Conway, Arkansas · Conway Regional Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA-28-180, built 1971 · all PA-28-180s on the register
Registration
N2184T · registry record · serial 28-7205028
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The flight instructor and student pilot were conducting an instructional flight in an airplane in which the student had only accumulated 1.2 hours of flight time. During the flight, the student performed one touch-and-go landing, then continued in the traffic pattern. While on the downwind leg, their preset fuel reminder to switch fuel tanks alerted on the GPS. At the direction of the flight instructor, the student turned on the fuel pump and repositioned the fuel selector handle to what he thought was the left fuel tank position. Shortly after, the student noted that the engine would not respond to throttle inputs and had sustained a loss of power. The flight instructor took control of the airplane and performed a forced landing to a field. During the landing, the nose landing gear collapsed, and the right wing sustained substantial damage. The student reported that during the egress he turned the fuel selector handle to the OFF position. The flight instructor stated that he did not direct the student to switch the fuel selector to the OFF position after the accident and he did not recall any postaccident discussion about the fuel selector. Postaccident examination of the airplane found that the fuel selector handle was positioned toward the OFF position, but it was not completely seated in the detent. A subsequent detailed examination determined that the fuel selector valve worked as expected with a steady flow of fuel when positioned to the left tank and right tank positions. There was no fuel flow when positioned to OFF. When the handle was moved to the same position where it was found after the accident, the fuel flow was restricted and would not have provided enough fuel flow for the engine to increase power when the throttle was advanced. There were no other preaccident mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Given that the loss of engine power occurred shortly after changing the fuel selector handle, it is likely that the student pilot inadvertently placed the fuel selector toward the OFF position, thus resulting in fuel starvation after the available fuel in the fuel system forward of the fuel selector to the engine had been exhausted. The flight instructor was unable to confirm the fuel selection during the flight because the selector handle was installed on the sidewall behind the student’s left leg.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel starvation during approach (VFR pattern downwind) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Student/instructed pilot
  • Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid management
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Identification/recognition › Instructor/check pilot
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Student/instructed pilot

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,015 hours in all; 196.4 in the last 90 days; 41.6 in the last 30 days; 770 as pilot in command; 493 on instruments
  • Last flight review: August 24, 2022
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 49 hours in all; 1 in this make and model; 0 in the last 90 days; 0 in the last 30 days
  • Medical certificate: None
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 6,589.3 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, January 12, 2024
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,400 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O&VO-360 (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Fisher Global LLC

The flight

  • Flight plan: none
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 130° at 3 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 52°F (11°C), dew point 39°F (4°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.16 inHg
  • Observation at 5:55 pm from KLRF, 22 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KLRF 312355Z AUTO 13003KT 10SM CLR 11/04 A3016 RMK AO2 SLP217 T01070039 10147 20085 56009 $

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

8 documents, released by the NTSB on November 7, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.