The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN23LA176 · Final report

Cessna 172P accident near Nacogdoches, Texas, April 28, 2023

On April 28, 2023 at about 7:11 pm local time, a 1980 Cessna 172P, registered N52602, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Nacogdoches, Texas (Nacogdoches A L Mangham JR Rgn airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The student pilot’s failure to maintain directional control during the landing roll.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 28, 2023 · about 7:11 pm local time
Place
Nacogdoches, Texas · Nacogdoches A L Mangham JR Rgn · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172P, built 1980 · all 172Ps on the register
Registration
N52602 · registry record · serial 17274562
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The student pilot stated he touched down and began to porpoise. The airplane began to slide to the right towards the runway edge. The student pilot’s attempt to stop was unsuccessful and the airplane exited the runway. During the runway excursion, the airplane nosed over which resulted in substantial damage to the right wing. The student pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control on ground during landing defining event
  2. Nose over/nose down during landing (landing roll)
  3. Runway excursion during landing
  4. Abnormal runway contact during landing
  5. Attempted remediation/recovery during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Student/instructed pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 36.3 hours in all; 36.3 in this make and model; 36.3 in the last 90 days; 7.7 in the last 30 days
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Operator: Hutch Aviation INC

The flight

  • Runway 18, 5,000 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 150° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 200 ft
  • Temperature: 75°F (24°C), dew point 61°F (16°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.82 inHg
  • Observation at 1:56 pm from KOCH

Weather report (METAR): KOCH 281856Z AUTO 15007KT 10SM FEW002 24/16 A2982 RMK AO2 SLP101 T02390161

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

2 documents, released by the NTSB on June 29, 2023. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.