The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN22LA325 · Final report

Cessna 305A accident near Mc Kinney, Texas, July 15, 2022

On July 15, 2022 at about 1:15 pm local time, a 1965 Cessna 305A, registered N5292G, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Mc Kinney, Texas. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The failure of the pilot to maintain adequate airspeed during landing resulting in an inadvertent aerodynamic stall.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 15, 2022 · about 1:15 pm local time
Place
Mc Kinney, Texas · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 305A, built 1965 · all 305As on the register
Registration
N5292G · registry record · serial 22515
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that while on final approach, the airplane was “high”, so he pulled off power to lose altitude and reduce airspeed. As the airplane was nearing the runway, the airplane entered an inadvertent aerodynamic stall. The stall horn sounded as the airplane pitched up, and the left wing lost lift. The airplane collided with terrain in a left-wing low attitude. The airplane sustained substantial damage to both wings and fuselage. The pilot reported that there were no mechanical malfunctions or failure with the airplane that would have precluded normal operations. The pilot also reported that he did not add power which allowed the airplane to enter a stall.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Aerodynamic stall/spin during landing defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action selection › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 1,187 hours in all; 25 in this make and model; 5 in the last 90 days; 2 in the last 30 days; 1,187 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: BasicMed
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection, December 19, 2001
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,300 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental O470-11B (piston); 0 hours total

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 160° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 79°F (26°C), dew point 70°F (21°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.09 inHg
  • Observation at 7:53 am from KTKI, 4 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KTKI 151253Z 16005KT 10SM CLR 26/21 A3009 RMK AO2 SLP182 T02560206

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

3 documents, released by the NTSB on August 1, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Other NTSB records under N5292G the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1985-05-01ATL85LA152 · accident near No.Myrtle Bch, SC · destroyed · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.