The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB CEN18LA119 · Final report

Czech Sport Aircraft As PIPER SPORT accident near Addison, Texas, March 10, 2018

On March 10, 2018 at about 10:46 pm local time, a 2010 Czech Sport Aircraft As PIPER SPORT, registered N422PS, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Addison, Texas (Addison airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The operator’s use of improper fuel, which resulted in partial loss of engine power due to vapor lock.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 10, 2018 · about 10:46 pm local time
Place
Addison, Texas · Addison · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Czech Sport Aircraft As PIPER SPORT, built 2010 · all PIPER SPORTs on the register
Registration
N422PS · no longer on the register · serial P1001010
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

According the operator, before the flight, the airplane was serviced with winter-grade 93-octane automotive gas. The flight instructor and one passenger were conducting a local introductory instructional flight; the outside ambient temperature was 81°F. The airplane's recorded data showed that the engine was running for about 18 minutes during engine start-up, taxi, engine run-up, and while holding short of the runway. During the engine run-up, the fuel flow was about 6 gallons per hour (gph), and the fuel pressure was between about 6 and 7 pounds per square inch (psi) at an engine speed of 4,000 rpm. Shortly after departure, the pilot stated to an air traffic controller that "we're having vapor lock, we need to come back and land." During the initial climb, the fuel flow increased to a peak of 9 gph, and the fuel pressure decreased to 3.3 psi at 5,025 rpm. The airplane made a climbing left turn to the southeast, continued circling left as the engine surged, and then descended toward the end of the departure runway before the flight track data ended. An airport surveillance video showed that, the airplane subsequently continued descending in a wings-level attitude near the end of the runway before it entered a sharp left bank and then impacted the ground. Examination of the airplane revealed no evidence of any preexisting mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Although the engine manufacturer recommended the use of mogas; however its Engine Operating Manual (EOM) warned to only use “fuel suitable for the respective climatic zone” and that there was a “risk of vapor formation if using winter [grade] fuel for summer operation.” The EOM stated that the fuel flow at takeoff is 7.1 gph. When an engine experiences vapor lock, air enters the fuel flow sensor and causes the unit to spin at a higher rate than if only fuel was passing through, and it is often represented as spikes in fuel flow. Therefore, the fuel flow reaching 9 gph during the initial climb was consistent with vapor lock. It is likely that, due to the use of a winter-grade fuel and the high ambient outside temperature, fuel vapor formed in the fuel system, which resulted in vapor lock and a partial loss of engine power.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Off-field or emergency landing during initial climb
  2. Fuel related during initial climb defining event
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid type
  • Organizational issues › Management › Resources › Adequacy of documents/info › Operator
  • Organizational issues › Management › Policy/procedure › Adequacy of policy/proc › Operator
  • Organizational issues › Management › Culture › Safety › Operator
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › High temperature › Contributed to outcome
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Ground crew

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Last flight review: August 31, 2017
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: serious injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,994.4 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, November 18, 2017
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,320 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rotax 912 ULS (piston); 773 hours total
  • Operator: Excite Aircraft Inc

The flight

  • Departed from: ADS Addison TX at 10:44 pm
  • Destination: ADS Addison TX
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 15, 7,203 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 180° at 9 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 81°F (27°C), dew point 55°F (13°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.68 inHg
  • Observation at 9:47 pm from KADS, 1 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number CEN18LA119.