The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN17LA264 · Final report

Bell 47D1 accident near Big Lake, Minnesota, July 6, 2017

On July 6, 2017 at about 4:30 pm local time, a 1947 Bell 47D1 (helicopter), registered N153B, was substantially damaged in an accident during standing (engine(s) operating) near Big Lake, Minnesota. It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The failure of the metal core assembly within a wooden main rotor blade due to undetected corrosion and fatigue, which caused the wooden blade to separate from the rotor mast.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 6, 2017 · about 4:30 pm local time
Place
Big Lake, Minnesota · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Bell 47D1, built 1947 · all 47D1s on the register
Registration
N153B · registry record · serial 7
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The airline transport pilot was preparing to depart in the helicopter on his fifth aerial application flight of the day. While on the ground, he increased engine rpm from idle to 3,100 rpm. Before making a collective input, the pilot felt a "sudden pull" and heard a "very loud snap." The pilot then saw that a company truck, which was parked nearby, had just sustained damaged and that the helicopter's two main rotor blades were missing. He shut down the engine; exited the helicopter; and found the main rotor blades, which were constructed of wood, splintered and scattered on the ground from about the helicopter's 2 o'clock position counterclockwise to its 8 o'clock position. The helicopter's transmission case was fractured, and the rotor mast had separated from the transmission and came to rest about 120 ft behind the helicopter's 7 to 9 o'clock positions. The damage to the company truck was consistent with impact from one or both main rotor blades. The main rotor blades were installed on the helicopter about 6 years before the accident. Examination of the recovered sections of the wood from the main rotor blades found that the blades were constructed according to blade design specifications and that there was no evidence of fungal decay in the wood. One main rotor blade had a metal core assembly separation near its root. Examination of two adjoining sections of the assembly revealed a fracture through the bar at the outboard edge of a lug. Visual examinations of the fracture faces revealed a corroded region at the trailing edge of the bar with fracture marks and arrest lines that were consistent with fatigue progression from the trailing edge. Ratchet marks indicated multiple fatigue origins in the area. The fatigue origin area had propagated about 0.25 inch toward the leading edge of the blade. Given this information, the main rotor blades most likely separated from the helicopter due to the failure of the blade's metal core assembly as a result of undetected corrosion and fatigue. The metal core assembly's fatigue origin area within the wooden blade would not have been visible to a pilot or mechanic, but x-ray nondestructive techniques could likely have detected the fatigue crack within the wooden blade. However, the Bell 47D1 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-approved maintenance manual and related FAA service bulletins did not include procedures to inspect the condition of the main rotor blade metal core assembly. The wooden main rotor blades are no longer manufactured, and an estimated 200 sets of these blades were still in operation at the time of this investigation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Part(s) separation from AC during standing (engine(s) operating) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft propeller/rotor › Main rotor system › Main rotor blade system › Failure
  • Organizational issues › Development › Design › Policy/procedure development › Manufacturer

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 16,300 hours in all; 20 in this make and model; 150 in the last 90 days; 80 in the last 30 days; 15,890 as pilot in command; 684 on instruments
  • Last flight review: March 3, 2016
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 11,902.5 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, May 15, 2017
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming VO-435-A1F (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: Big Lake MN at 4:30 pm
  • Destination: Big Lake MN
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 170° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 82°F (28°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.94 inHg
  • Observation at 4:55 pm from KCFE, 11 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

11 documents, released by the NTSB on May 2, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.