Piper J3C accident near Chetek, Wisconsin, May 24, 2017
On May 24, 2017 at about 11:30 pm local time, a 1941 Piper J3C, registered N35132, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering near Chetek, Wisconsin. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane while flying at a low altitude, which resulted in the airplane exceeding the critical angle of attack and a subsequent aerodynamic stall.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- May 24, 2017 · about 11:30 pm local time
- Place
- Chetek, Wisconsin · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Piper J3C 65, built 1941 · all J3Cs on the register
- Registration
- N35132 · registry record · serial 6144
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The private pilot and the passenger were on a local flight in the airplane; the pilot was seated in the rear seat and the passenger was in the front seat. Several witnesses, located west of the accident location, observed the airplane flying low, heading north, just west of a river. After overflying several people on a pond, the airplane continued to the north briefly and then started a right turn. The nose of the airplane dropped, and the airplane descended rapidly below the tree line. The passenger stated that the airplane started to turn and then went straight down. The airplane impacted the river and came to rest in the water. The passenger, who was seated in the front seat, did not recall exiting the airplane but did recall being underwater, surfacing, and swimming to the bank of the river. The pilot, who was seated in the rear seat, was ejected from the airplane and found face down in the water when first responders arrived. Examination of the airplane indicated that it impacted the river in about a 45° nose-down attitude. No evidence was found of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airframe, flight controls, engine, or related systems that would have precluded normal operation. Witness statements, the passenger's statement, and the damage to the airplane are consistent with an aerodynamic stall followed by an uncontrolled descent and impact with the river. An examination of the lap belts and shoulder harnesses in the airplane revealed that the front and rear lap belts were buckled; the front and rear shoulder harness straps were not attached to the buckles; and one side of each lap belt was not attached to its mounting bracket. For the rear seat, the left mounting bracket for the lap belt had failed in overload likely during the impact sequence. For the front seat, the left-side webbing of the lap belt was found not attached to the mounting bracket, and the right-side webbing of the lap belt was found knotted to the mounting bracket, which was an improper method for attaching the belt to the bracket. The pilot had fastened the lap belt for the passenger before the flight; had the webbing not been secured at that time, it is likely that the passenger and the pilot would have noted that fact. Therefore, it is likely that the left-side webbing was also knotted to the wire bracket and came undone during the impact sequence. Based on the passenger's statement that he was not wearing a shoulder harness, the inflight video taken by the passenger, and the postaccident finding that the front and rear seat shoulder harness straps were not attached to the buckled lap belts, it is apparent that neither the pilot nor the passenger were using the shoulder harness portions of their restraint system at the time of the accident. The damage to the airplane, the location of the pilot following the accident, and the injuries to both the pilot and the passenger are consistent with the pilot being ejected forward, into the back of the front seat, and then likely out the front windscreen of the airplane. The passenger's facial injuries were consistent with the passenger impacting the airplane's instrument panel. Investigators were unable to determine what method, if any, was used to approve the installation of the shoulder harness. It is unknown if the seatbelts and shoulder harnesses installed were part of a properly certified restrain system. Without the method of certification or approval of the restraint system, investigators were further unable to determine what role the failure to use the restraint system played in the pilot's ejection, mitigation of the pilot's injuries, and protection from injuries for the front seat occupant. However, both occupants likely would have benefited from the use of a properly certificated and installed four-point restraint system in this accident.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control in flight during maneuvering defining event
- Aerodynamic stall/spin during maneuvering
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
- Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power)
The NTSB's findings
- cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Equipment/furnishings › Flight compartment equipment › Not used/operated
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Equipment/furnishings › Flight compartment equipment › Incorrect service/maintenance
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Equipment/furnishings › Flight compartment equipment › Failure
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Flight time: 175 hours in all; 17.1 in this make and model; 24.7 in the last 90 days; 3.5 in the last 30 days
- Last flight review: February 15, 2017
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rear
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 205.2 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, May 15, 2016
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Continental C85-12F (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: Chetek WI at 11:00 pm
- Destination: Chetek WI
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 050° at 3 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: broken clouds at 4,100 ft
- Temperature: 59°F (15°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
- Altimeter: 29.70 inHg
- Observation at 11:35 pm from KY23, 35 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
7 documents, released by the NTSB on September 12, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Passenger Statement | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Record of Conversation - Owner | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 3 | Witness Statements | PDF, 6 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Materials Laboratory Factual Report | PDF, 11 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Toxicological Report | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 6 | Accident Report Photographs | PDF, 17 pages | View Download |
| 7 | Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
