The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN15IA079 · Final report

Cessna T182T incident near Cahokia, Illinois, December 12, 2014

On December 12, 2014 at about 7:00 pm local time, a 2007 Cessna T182T, registered N93CL, was involved in an incident during initial climb near Cahokia, Illinois (St. Louis Downtown Airport). It was a flight test under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The mechanic’s improper installation of the elevator trim actuator, which resulted in reversed elevator trim control, and his subsequent failure to detect the misrigging of the elevator cables during the postmaintenance inspection.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
December 12, 2014 · about 7:00 pm local time
Place
Cahokia, Illinois · St. Louis Downtown Airport · map
Type
Incident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna T182T, built 2007 · all T182Ts on the register
Registration
N93CL · no longer on the register · serial T18208757
Damage
Not recorded
Flight
Flight test · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was conducting a postmaintenance test flight. He reported that the airplane was about 900 ft above ground level in the crosswind turn after takeoff when it "began to pitch steeply toward the ground." The airplane lost about 200 to 300 ft of altitude. He pulled hard aft on the yoke to keep the nose level, and he confirmed that the autopilot was not engaged. He called for the pilot-certificated passenger to assist him in pulling aft on the yoke, which required "extreme back pressure." The pilot maneuvered the airplane to land on the longest and widest runway available. During the flight, the pilot incrementally added nose-up elevator trim in an effort to relieve the nose-down pressure; however, this had no effect. The manual elevator trim wheel indicated that the trim was in the full nose-up trim position. The pilot turned the airplane onto the base leg and was still unable to relieve the "extremely strong" nose-down tendency. He remembered that maintenance had been performed on the elevator trim system and thought that there might be some kind of control-reversal problem. While on the base leg of the approach, he decided to apply nose-down trim using the electric trim on the control yoke. The nose-down control forces lessened, and he immediately realized that there was a control reversal. The pilot proceeded to make a normal approach and landed without incident. The examination of the airplane's elevator trim system revealed that moving the elevator trim wheel to the full nose-down position resulted in the elevator trim tab moving to the down position, which would place the airplane in a nose-up configuration and indicated that the elevator trim control was reversed. The airframe and powerplant mechanic who had performed the maintenance on the airplane, which included replacing the elevator trim actuator, inadvertently misrigged the elevator control cables. The airplane's maintenance manual instructed mechanics to "make sure that the trim tab moves in the correct direction when it is operated by the trim wheel" and contained a note stating that "nose down trim corresponds to the tab UP position." The mechanic did not ensure that the trim tabs moved in the correct direction during his postmaintenance inspection after he installed the elevator trim actuator.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Flight control sys malf/fail during initial climb defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › Elevator tab control system › Incorrect service/maintenance
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Maintenance personnel
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Post maintenance inspection › Maintenance personnel
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › Maintenance/inspections › (general) › Inadequate inspection

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 400 hours in all; 50 in this make and model; 27 in the last 90 days; 13 in the last 30 days
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 250 hours in all; 20 in the last 90 days; 4 in the last 30 days
  • Last flight review: December 17, 2014
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 348 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, November 13, 2014
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,100 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming TIO-540-AK1A (piston); 348 hours total
  • Operator: Ccl Aircraft LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: CPS Cahokia IL at 6:50 pm
  • Destination: CPS Cahokia IL
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 12R, 7,002 ft by 150 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 46°F (8°C), dew point 36°F (2°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.32 inHg
  • Observation at 5:53 pm from CPS

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

10 documents, released by the NTSB on February 19, 2015. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.