Cessna 560XL incident near Traverse City, Michigan, March 26, 2014
On March 26, 2014 at about 7:21 pm local time, a 2007 Cessna 560XL, registered N580QS, was involved in an incident during landing (landing roll) near Traverse City, Michigan (Cherry Capital airport). It was flown under fractional-ownership rules (Part 91 subpart K). No one was hurt; 4 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The inoperative galley drain tube heater, which allowed water within the tube to freeze and led to its failure; the tube’s failure allowed water to drain onto the rudder cables and freeze and resulted in the rudder binding during landing.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- March 26, 2014 · about 7:21 pm local time · cases in 2014
- Place
- Traverse City, Michigan · Cherry Capital · cases near this airport · map
- Type
- Incident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 4 people were on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Cessna 560XL, built 2007 · all 560XLs on the register
- Registration
- N580QS · registry record · serial 560-5741
- Damage
- Not recorded
- Flight
- Flight · fractional-ownership rules (Part 91 subpart K)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The flight was conducted at flight level 400, and the entire flight was 3 hours 17 minutes long. During the landing at the destination airport, the flying pilot noted that the rudder pedals were hard or frozen; however, he was able to make an uneventful landing. The nonflying pilot then took the flight controls and confirmed the rudder pedal situation. Once slowed to a safe speed, the flight crew was able to break the rudder pedals free and to taxi the airplane to the ramp. After the airplane was parked and shut down, the rudder still felt stiff and required more input than normal to operate. Postaccident examinations confirmed compliance with an alert service letter and service bulletin related to control cable icing. Examinations also revealed witness mark consistent with a water line in the fuselage area, and a liquid consistent with pooled deice fluid, staining, and moisture was found in the tailcone compartment. Water was also found where the galley drain exits the pressure vessel and enters the fairing area. Water was observed draining from the black foam wrap around the drain tube's heating element, and the black foam exhibited deformation consistent with the expansion of frozen water. Removal of the foam revealed an opening in the drain tube. Testing of the galley drain heating element revealed that it was inoperative. Black foam deposits were observed on a rudder cable, but no rudder system anomalies were detected. Laboratory tests revealed that an opening in the drain tube caused the rudder cables to freeze to the drain mast, and some additional force above a baseline was needed to break the simulated rudder pedals free from a static position. At the time of the incident, the airplane's approved inspection program did not specify that the galley drain tube or heater should be inspected. Additionally, the failure of the galley drain heater is not annunciated to the flight crew nor to maintenance personnel. It is likely that the undetected failure of the galley drain tube heater allowed the water within the galley drain tube to freeze, which led to the tube's failure. Once the tube failed, water was allowed to drain from the tube onto the rudder cables; this water also froze due to the inoperative heater and caused the rudder to bind during landing.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Flight control sys malf/fail during landing (landing roll) defining event
- Loss of control on ground during landing (landing roll)
The NTSB's findings
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Water and waste system › Water/waste sys wiring › Failure other cases naming the heating, ice protection and utility systems
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › Rudder control system › Inoperative other cases naming the flight controls
Pilot
- Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 4,658 in this make and model
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
Co-pilot
- Certificate: airline transport pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 2,796 in this make and model
- Last flight review: November 8, 2013
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 5,183 hours
- Last inspection: approved inspection programme, March 1, 2014
- Maximum gross weight: 20,400 lb
- Seats: 9
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine 1: P&W Canada PW545B (turbofan); 0 hours total
- Engine 2: P&W Canada PW545B (turbofan); 0 hours total
- Operator: Netjets Sales INC
The flight
- Departed from: SRQ Sarasota/Bradenton FL at 4:10 pm
- Destination: TVC Traverse City MI
- Flight plan: IFR
- Runway 28, 6,901 ft by 150 ft
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 210° at 5 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: a few clouds at 4,200 ft
- Temperature: 28°F (-2°C), dew point 9°F (-13°C)
- Altimeter: 30.15 inHg
- Observation at 6:53 pm from KTVC
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 2 | |||
| Passengers | 2 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
8 documents, released by the NTSB on April 2, 2015. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Crew Statements | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Communication Summaries | PDF, 7 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Images Supplied by Operator | PDF, 32 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Images Supplied by Operator of Deformed Insulation on Additional Airplanes | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 6 | Certification of Party Representative | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 7 | Weather Report | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 8 | Flightaware Excerpt | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Connections how this case links to the rest of the register
- N580QS on the register today · the tail number may have moved to another aircraft since
- Cessna 560 Citation V, Ultra, Encore and Excel 1,344 registered today · the model family and its accident history
- Cessna 72,677 aircraft on the register
- Engine: P&W Canada PW545B 154 aircraft carry this series today · as the NTSB recorded it
- Engine: P&W Canada PW545B 154 aircraft carry this series today · as the NTSB recorded it
- Cherry Capital Airport · nearest airport
- Sarasota/Bradenton International · departed from
- Accidents and incidents in Michigan 2,107 since 1982 · 230 in the last ten years
- Michigan 7,230 aircraft registered
The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/CEN14IA172.json.
The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
