The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN13LA362 · Final report

Piper PA-24-260 accident near Eagle, Colorado, June 28, 2013

On June 28, 2013 at about 8:55 pm local time, a Piper PA-24-260, registered N856CC, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach near Eagle, Colorado (Eagle County Rgnl airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilots’ improper fuel management, which resulted in the loss of engine power due to fuel starvation. Contributing to the accident was worn and corroded fuel senders, which transmitted inaccurate fuel readings to the fuel monitoring system.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 28, 2013 · about 8:55 pm local time
Place
Eagle, Colorado · Eagle County Rgnl · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA-24-260 · all PA-24-260s on the register
Registration
N856CC · no longer on the register · serial 24-4020
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During the flight, the airplane's engine experienced a loss of power, and the copilot took control of the airplane from the pilot, who had been flying, and directed the pilot to attempt to restart the engine. The airplane descended and impacted terrain short of the runway. The fuel tank selector was found in the left main tank position, but no visible fuel was found in the left main tank. After battery power was applied to the airplane, the engine data monitoring system indicated that the left main tank had 11 gallons of fuel and the right main tank had 8 gallons of fuel. After the fuel floats were moved, the monitoring system indicated that the left main tank had 2 gallons of fuel and that the right main tank had 9.5 gallons of fuel. Regardless of the fuel quantity indications, the pilots should have known how much fuel was in each tank and, based on fuel calculations, known when each tank was going to become empty. Further, the pilot should have switched fuel tanks as part of the engine restart procedures; however, he did not report doing so. Each of the four fuel tank senders were examined and wear and corrosion were found on all of them. When tested with a voltmeter, none of the fuel floats provided consistent electrical signals, which would alter the amount of fuel indicated on the engine monitoring system. Because the selector was positioned to the left main tank, the engine lost power due to fuel starvation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel starvation during approach defining event
  2. Loss of engine power (total) during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid management
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › Fuel quantity sensor › Fatigue/wear/corrosion
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Forgotten action/omission › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 220.6 hours in all; 2.2 in the last 90 days; 2.2 in the last 30 days
  • Last flight review: May 14, 2013
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot, flight engineer, private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming TIO-540 SER (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: CRQ Carlsbad CA at 4:15 pm
  • Destination: EGE Eagle CO
  • Flight plan: VFR
  • Runway 25, 9,000 ft by 150 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 260° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear at 12,000 ft
  • Temperature: 90°F (32°C), dew point 34°F (1°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.28 inHg
  • Observation at 8:50 pm from KEGE, 1 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

2 documents, released by the NTSB on February 5, 2014. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Correspondence: FAA Inspector PDF, 2 pages View Download
2 Photo 1: Wreckage Overview PDF, 1 page View Download

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.