The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN13LA229 · Final report

Beech N35 accident near Warren, Arkansas, April 15, 2013

On April 15, 2013 at about 2:45 pm local time, a Beech N35, registered N9414Y, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Warren, Arkansas (Warren Municipal airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The fatigue failure of the engine crankshaft due to oversized crankcase saddle bores, which resulted from maintenance personnel improperly resizing the saddle bores during engine maintenance.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 15, 2013 · about 2:45 pm local time · cases in 2013
Place
Warren, Arkansas · Warren Municipal · cases near this airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Beech N35 · all N35s on the register
Registration
N9414Y · no longer on the register · serial D-6592
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that the engine lost power during the initial climb. He then established a glide in an attempt to return to the airport; however, due to "strong" wind, the airplane landed "abruptly short of the runway." A postaccident engine examination revealed that the crankshaft had fractured due to fatigue through the No. 3 cheek immediately aft of the No. 2 main bearing journal. Portions of the saddle bore diameter at the nose of the crankshaft were oversized. The crankcase No. 2 main bearing saddle exhibited longitudinal deformation adjacent to the bore with fretting and galling on the saddle landings. The No. 1 main bearing shells were deformed; the No. 2 main bearing shells were worn, deformed, and partially split. The remaining bearings exhibited helical lines that matched the machining lines on the crankcase main bearing saddles. The tin coating had been worn away except around the oil transfer holes. The appearance of the main bearing shells was consistent with the bearings shifting during operation due to insufficient crush, which was likely caused by the oversized main saddle bore diameters. Maintenance records indicated that the engine was disassembled about 15 months before the accident due to a propeller strike. At that time, maintenance personnel cut the crankcase mating surfaces and resized the saddle bores. The engine had accumulated about 16.5 hours since the engine was reinstalled. It is likely that maintenance personnel improperly resized the saddle bores during the engine maintenance.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (total) during initial climb defining event
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (reciprocating) › Recip eng cyl section › Failure other cases naming the engine
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (reciprocating) › Recip eng cyl section › Fatigue/wear/corrosion other cases naming the engine
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (reciprocating) › Recip eng cyl section › Incorrect service/maintenance other cases naming the engine
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › (general) › Maintenance personnel

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, flight engineer
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 7,832 hours in all; 800 in this make and model; 100 in the last 90 days; 25 in the last 30 days; 7,436 as pilot in command; 682 on instruments
  • Last flight review: February 24, 2013
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 6,266 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, March 5, 2013
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,125 lb
  • Seats: 5
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Cont Motor IO-520-BA(6) (piston); 1,713 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: 3M9 Warren AR at 2:30 pm
  • Destination: MEZ Mena AR
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 21, 3,829 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 170° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 1,300 ft
  • Temperature: 66°F (19°C), dew point 61°F (16°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.87 inHg
  • Observation at 2:53 pm from LLQ, 17 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

5 documents, released by the NTSB on April 27, 2015. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/CEN13LA229.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.