Piper PA-30 accident near Amarillo, Texas, July 25, 2013
On July 25, 2013 at about 2:00 pm local time, a Piper PA-30, registered N8306Y, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Amarillo, Texas (Tradewind Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s failure to maintain airplane control after a loss of left engine power due to water-contaminated fuel. Contributing to the accident was the lack of a proper preflight that could have detected water accumulation in the fuel system before takeoff.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- July 25, 2013 · about 2:00 pm local time
- Place
- Amarillo, Texas · Tradewind Airport · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Piper PA-30 · all PA-30s on the register
- Registration
- N8306Y · no longer on the register · serial 30-1445
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot of the twin-engine airplane contacted air traffic control (ATC) and requested visual flight rules flight following and was cleared for departure. Three minutes later, he checked in with the controller, and about 6 minutes later, he radioed to ATC that he was going to return to the departure airport because he was having engine trouble. Shortly thereafter, the pilot reported that his left engine had stopped. The controller asked if he wanted to declare an emergency; the pilot declined and reported that he had the airport in sight. Security camera video showed the aircraft returning to the airport at a very slow speed, then the aircraft turned sharply to the left and rapidly descended below the trees. About 0.8 miles from the approach end of the runway, the airplane impacted nose down into the yard of a home within a dense populated residential area. A witness reported that he saw the airplane turning and that the airplane's left propeller was not turning and not feathered. Examination of the wreckage revealed that the left propeller assembly showed little deformation, consistent with little or no rotation or power at impact. The right propeller had deformation signatures consistent with rotation/power at impact. No mechanical anomalies were found during detailed examination of the left engine and its components. Thunderstorms and significant amounts of rain had passed through the area during the week before the accident. The airplane had been parked outside on the ramp during the heavy rain. All fuel flow components through the left and right fuel sumps and filters were located and examined. Examination of the left sump and filter revealed it to be contaminated with about 75-percent water as well as a dark sand-like substance. The right side sump contained mostly fuel with only a trace amount of water. The airplane was fueled 3 days before the accident and the source of the fuel was tested; no water contamination was found. It is likely that water entered the fuel system while the airplane was parked outside in the rain and that the pilot did not sump the fuel tanks before takeoff and the left engine stopped producing power due to water contamination. It is unknown why the pilot could not maintain control of the airplane with the right engine producing power.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control in flight during emergency descent
- Fuel contamination during initial climb defining event
The NTSB's findings
- cause Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid condition
- cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained
- factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Preflight inspection › Pilot
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land
- Flight time: 1,600 hours in all; 50 in this make and model; 50 in the last 90 days; 15 in the last 30 days
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 4,023 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, April 1, 2013; 50 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 3,600 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine 1: Lycoming IO-320 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total
- Engine 2: Lycoming IO-320 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: TDW Amarillo TX
- Destination: Lubbock TX
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 120° at 12 knots, gusting 16
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: broken clouds at 5,500 ft; a few clouds
- Temperature: 64°F (18°C), dew point 63°F (17°C)
- Altimeter: 30.18 inHg
- Observation at 1:53 pm from AMA, 1 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
