The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN12LA349 · Final report

Amateur-built J D accident near Spring Valley, Ohio, June 9, 2012

On June 9, 2012 at about 12:05 pm local time, a amateur-built J D, registered N9010T, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering near Spring Valley, Ohio. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The in-flight failure of the left wing spar, which resulted in the in-flight separation of the left wing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 9, 2012 · about 12:05 pm local time
Place
Spring Valley, Ohio · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built J D
Registration
N9010T · registry record · serial 01
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The owner-designed and built experimental airplane crashed in a grass field in a rural area after the left wing separated in flight. The main wreckage included the fuselage, engine, tail surfaces, and the right wing; the left wing was located about 1/2 mile from the main wreckage. The left wing was mostly intact, but the wing control surfaces had separated. Examination of the inboard end of the left main wing spar revealed that the wood structure of the spar had failed and separated at the spar attachment bolt locations. No witnesses to the accident flight were identified; however, it is likely that the pilot was maneuvering when the wing separation occurred. Because the airplane was a unique design and investigators did not have access to the design parameters, it was not possible to determine precisely why the wing spar failed. Postaccident examination of the airframe revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation other than the separated wing spar previously described. Based on the available evidence, it is likely that the left wing spar failed and resulted in an in-flight separation of the wing and the airplane’s subsequent impact with the ground.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during maneuvering defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Wing structure › Spar (on wing) › Failure

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: glider
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: ctr
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Seats: 1
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Chevrolet LS1 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: I19 Dayton OH
  • Destination: I19 Dayton OH
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 25,000 ft
  • Temperature: 63°F (17°C), dew point 55°F (13°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.04 inHg
  • Observation at 11:55 am from FFO, 12 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N9010T the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1999-09-16ATL99FA132 · accident near Heflin, AL · destroyed · fatal
1991-09-18MIA91LA220 · accident near Bay Springs, MS · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.