The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ANC18FA028 · Final report

Mooney M20J accident near Petaluma, California, April 7, 2018

On April 7, 2018, a 1990 Mooney M20J, registered N9133Z, was destroyed in an accident during initial climb near Petaluma, California (Petaluma Muni airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain adequate airspeed while departing in instrument meteorological conditions, moderate turbulence, and low-level wind shear, which resulted in the airplane exceeding its critical angle of attack and a subsequent aerodynamic stall.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 7, 2018
Place
Petaluma, California · Petaluma Muni · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Mooney M20J NO SERIES, built 1990 · all M20Js on the register
Registration
N9133Z · no longer on the register · serial 24-1700-14
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was departing the non-tower-controlled airport on an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan. He received his IFR clearance before departure but the pilot never contacted air traffic control after takeoff. The wreckage was located about 4 hours later about 1 mile from the departure airport. A witness located at the departure airport watched the airplane depart and climb to about 300 ft above ground level (agl) before it initiated a shallow left turn and disappeared into the fog. The witness reported that there were no unusual sounds from the airplane during the takeoff, and that the engine sounded normal.  Instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) were present in the vicinity of the accident site at the time of the accident. In addition, AIRMETs were valid that warned of IFR conditions due to precipitation and mist and moderate turbulence below 10,000 ft. A possibility of light low-level wind shear (LLWS) was identified between the surface and 100 ft agl at the accident site. Multiple pilot reports in the area indicated cloud ceilings around 400-700 ft agl with moderate turbulence. However, the pilot obtained weather information about 6 hours before takeoff, which only included the AIRMETs and not the PIREPs indicated the cloud ceiling and turbulence. A postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The damage to the airplane indicated that it impacted the ground in a nose-down, near-vertical attitude consistent with an aerodynamic stall. Given the weather information available for the accident site around the time of the accident, the pilot likely encountered IMC with areas of turbulence and LLWS almost immediately after takeoff and did not maintain sufficient airspeed for these conditions, which resulted in an exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack and an aerodynamic stall.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during initial climb defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Below VFR minima › Effect on operation
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence › (general) › Effect on operation
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Windshear › Effect on operation

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,768 hours in all
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,025.9 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, August 1, 2017
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,899 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-360-A3B6D (piston); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: O69 Petaluma CA at 10:10 pm
  • Destination: L18 Fallbrook CA
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 11, 3,602 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 0.8 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 600 ft
  • Temperature: 59°F (15°C), dew point 59°F (15°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.87 inHg
  • Observation at 11:55 pm from O69, 2 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

11 documents, released by the NTSB on June 26, 2020. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.