The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ANC04LA050 · Final report

Cessna U206F accident near Nanwalek, Alaska, May 2, 2004

On May 2, 2004 at about 9:40 pm local time, a Cessna U206F, registered N35860, was substantially damaged in an accident near Nanwalek, Alaska (English Bay airport). It was flown under charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135). No one was hurt; 5 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A loss of directional control for an undetermined reason during takeoff-initial climb, which resulted in the left wing colliding with the ground.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 2, 2004 · about 9:40 pm local time
Place
Nanwalek, Alaska · English Bay · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 5 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna U206F · all U206Fs on the register
Registration
N35860 · no longer on the register · serial U20602764
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight · charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial certificated pilot was departing a remote gravel runway, located adjacent to a rocky beach, on an on-demand air taxi flight. The airplane was equipped with a short takeoff and landing (STOL) modification. The STOL installation droops the ailerons about 16 degrees as the flaps are extended. The pilot said he lowered the airplane flaps to 20 degrees and applied full power for a short field takeoff with the control yoke aft. As the airplane gained speed, the pilot said the nose of the airplane rotated to about 10 degrees above the horizon, and the main landing gear tires lifted off the runway surface. About 3 feet above the runway, the airplane suddenly rolled to the left. The pilot applied right aileron and right rudder to stop the roll, without affect. The left wingtip collided with small rocks along the beach about 800 feet from the beginning of the runway, and the airplane swerved about 30 degrees to the left. The airplane came to rest on a rocky beach, about 150 degrees to the left of the runway centerline. The pilot said the engine was producing power throughout the event. He did not report any aileron control problem. Postaccident photographs of the accident scene and the airplane revealed that the left wing was bent upward at the tip. The right wing was bent upward about midspan. A view of the aft side of the airplane revealed that the left wing flap was extended slightly. The right wing flap was extended about one-half of its range. The airplane was recovered by insurance and company personnel, and transported to the operator's facility. The wings, rudder, horizontal stabilizer, and the elevator were removed for transport. Postaccident examination of the wings by the NTSB investigator-in-charge revealed no observed mechanical malfunction of the internal flap and aileron control mechanism within each wing. Since the wings were removed for recovery, the rigging of the aileron and flap cables could not be established. The right front seat passenger was recording the flight on a hand-held video recorder. Review of a copy of the video tape revealed that the airplane was taxied at a fast pace toward the departure end of the runway. The airpane made a rolling "U" turn, did not slow or stop, and the pilot applied full power. As the airplane lifed off, it almost immeditely rolled to the left and collided with the ground. The video does not record any sound of a stall warning horn, or a view of the flap handle position. The elapsed time from application of full power for takeoff, until the left wing collided with the ground, was about 17 seconds. Following the accident, additional video from the passenger's camera recorded the position of the airplane at the point of rest. The video showed that the left flap appeared to be slightly extended. The right flap appeared extended about one-half of its normal travel.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,310 hours in all; 990 in this make and model; 119 in the last 90 days; 49 in the last 30 days; 1,109 as pilot in command; 37 on instruments
  • Last flight review: April 19, 2004
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (valid medical--w/ waivers/lim.)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 7,650 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, March 28, 2004; 98 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,600 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental IO-520-DCF (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: KEB Nanwalek AK at 4:40 pm
  • Destination: PAHO Homer AK
  • Runway 01, 1,850 ft by 50 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 270° at 3 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 1,500 ft
  • Temperature: 45°F (7°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew1
Passengers4

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.