32 failure reports named the squib in the last ten years, 118 since 1996, most often on the Boeing 767; the condition most often found was "no test". 3 FAA approvals let 2 companies make a replacement squib, Kidde Aerospace holding the most (2). The reports call it "squib", "left squib".
Reports by year
Reports by year, as a table
reports
1996
1
1997
3
1998
4
1999
3
2000
2
2001
8
2002
3
2003
1
2004
7
2005
2
2006
5
2007
15
2008
8
2009
1
2010
4
2011
5
2012
5
2013
6
2014
2
2015
1
2016
1
2017
1
2018
1
2019
1
2020
1
2021
5
2022
10
2023
2
2024
4
2025
3
2026
3
Which system the reports file it under last ten years
no test11failed3expired2failed insp2activation error1blown1disconnected1faulted1faulty1installed1
Conditions found, as a table
reports
no test
11
failed
3
expired
2
failed insp
2
activation error
1
blown
1
disconnected
1
faulted
1
faulty
1
installed
1
Approved replacement parts 3 parts manufacturer approvals
A parts manufacturer approval (PMA) lets a company other than the aircraft's maker make a squib and sell it as an approved part for the models named. These are the companies holding such approvals for a squib:
Sources: the FAA's service difficulty reports since 1995 (a report is a part that failed and was fixed, as filed by an airline, repair station or owner; the count shows reporting as much as reliability) and the parts manufacturer approvals in the FAA's Dynamic Regulatory System. The part name is the reporters' and the approval holders' own words, reduced to the first plain words so that spellings meet.