The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Parts · Airframe structure

Expansion Joint

29 failure reports named the expansion joint in the last ten years, 33 since 2000, most often on the Boeing 737; the condition most often found was "cracked". 2 FAA approvals let 1 company make a replacement expansion joint, Cox and Company INC holding the most (2).

Reports by year

0247920002017202312024
Reports by year, as a table
reports
20001
20031
20121
20151
20162
20174
20199
20206
20212
20224
20231
20241

Which system the reports file it under last ten years

Reports by system, as a table
reports
Airframe structure29

Models most often reporting it last ten years

Models most reported, as a table
reports
Boeing 73726
Bombardier CL-600 Challenger and CRJ1

How it failed the condition found, last ten years

cracked28corroded1
Conditions found, as a table
reports
cracked28
corroded1

Approved replacement parts 2 parts manufacturer approvals

A parts manufacturer approval (PMA) lets a company other than the aircraft's maker make a expansion joint and sell it as an approved part for the models named. These are the companies holding such approvals for a expansion joint:

MakerPartReplacesFitsGrantedStatus
Cox and Company INCExpansion Joint Assy., Anti-Icing 6052-1BVC 107PS564-1Colombia Helicopters 107-111981-11-11current
Cox and Company INCExpansion Joint Assy., Anti-Icing 6052-6BVC 107PS564-6Colombia Helicopters 107-111981-11-11current

Sources: the FAA's service difficulty reports since 1995 (a report is a part that failed and was fixed, as filed by an airline, repair station or owner; the count shows reporting as much as reliability) and the parts manufacturer approvals in the FAA's Dynamic Regulatory System. The part name is the reporters' and the approval holders' own words, reduced to the first plain words so that spellings meet.