The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR26FA257 · Preliminary: the investigation is not finished

Luscombe 8A accident near Canton, Texas, July 14, 2026

On July 14, 2026 at about 6:56 pm local time, a 1946 Luscombe 8A, registered N1164K, was substantially damaged in an accident near Canton, Texas (Goode Field). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The NTSB has not yet published a probable cause for this accident. Investigations usually take one to two years; this page updates when the final report is released.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 14, 2026 · about 6:56 pm local time · cases in 2026
Place
Canton, Texas · Goode Field · cases near this airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
not recorded
Aircraft
Luscombe 8A, built 1946 · all 8As on the register
Registration
N1164K · registry record · serial 3891
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative preliminary · quoted from the NTSB record

On July 14, 2026, sometime between 1252 and 1356 CDT, a Luscombe 8A, N1164K, was substantially damaged when it crashed in a field near Canton, Texas. The pilot, who was the sole occupant, was fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The flight had originated from the pilot’s private airstrip where the airplane was hangared, which was oriented north to south. A farmer discovered the airplane wreckage about 800 ft northwest of the private airstrip, at about 1356. There were no eyewitnesses to the accident. The pilot sent a text message to a friend at about 1252, which was his last known communication. Additionally, a nearby resident reported hearing what sounded like an engine “winding up” for a few seconds, followed by less than a second of silence, then a “boom” sound. He stated that he heard the sound within the general timeframe of the accident, but he was unable to identify the specific time. The accident pilot purchased the airplane in December 2025. His wife told investigators that the pilot flew the airplane frequently and that they felt it did not produce sufficient take-off performance for them to fly together. She said he usually flew it in the morning or evening and had not flown the airplane much in high-temperature conditions. When she returned home from an appointment at around 1400, she observed the windsock located at the north end of the runway, which indicated the wind was from the north. She noted that the wind had been coming from the south earlier in the day. She said that the pilot typically took off to the south because the prevailing winds were generally from that direction, but on the day of the accident she believed he must have taken off to the north. Figure 1: Overhead map view of accident location The airplane impacted a field in a steep, nose-down attitude about 800 feet northwest of the northern end of the private airstrip. The longitudinal axis of the fuselage was oriented on a heading of about 349° magnetic and exhibited fore-aft crushing. All major structures and components of the airplane were located within the immediate wreckage area. Pieces of windscreen plexiglass were scattered forward and left of the primary wreckage, within about a 30-ft diameter. Disturbance of the surface soil was limited to the area located immediately under the wreckage. Figure 2: Photo of airplane wreckage at accident scene The right wing was displaced aft and the left wing was displaced forward. Compression wrinkling was observed along the top skin of the left wing along with forward bending at the wing root leading edge. The right wing was damaged at the outboard leading edge and the aft spar had separated at the fuselage. Both the left and right ailerons remained attached to their respective wings. The empennage remained intact and attached to the aft fuselage. Both elevators and the rudder also remained attached. The elevator trim tab was connected to the left elevator and articulated freely by hand. The upper fuselage had collapsed into the cabin. The propeller remained attached to the engine crank flange. One blade was intact and exhibited no chordwise scratches or damage. The second blade was fractured and splintered near the blade root with aft bending.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during unknown defining event

The aircraft

  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed

The flight

  • Departed from: TX43 Canton TX
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 18/3, 3,200 ft by 50 ft

Weather at the time

  • Wind: from 120° at 9 knots, gusting 18
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 4,900 ft; scat at 4,200 ft
  • Temperature: 88°F (31°C), dew point 70°F (21°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.09 inHg
  • Observation at 1:00 pm from KTRL, 18 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KTRL 141753Z AUTO 12009G18KT 10SM SCT042 BKN049 31/21 A3009 RMK AO2 SLP181 T03110206 10322 20244 58006

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The NTSB has not released the docket for this case yet. The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), is usually released when the investigation is nearly complete, and the list here is refreshed when it appears. Check at the NTSB.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/WPR26FA257.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.