The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR23LA203 · Final report

Piper PA-28-181 accident near West Jordan, Utah, May 29, 2023

On May 29, 2023 at about 5:52 pm local time, a 2000 Piper PA-28-181, registered N456Y, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near West Jordan, Utah (South Valley Regional Airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Loss of engine power due to fuel starvation as a result of the mechanic’s failure to properly secure the fuel system gascolator strainer bowl.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 29, 2023 · about 5:52 pm local time
Place
West Jordan, Utah · South Valley Regional Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA-28-181, built 2000 · all PA-28-181s on the register
Registration
N456Y · registry record · serial 2843353
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The flight instructor was conducting a local flight in preparation for the student pilot’s private pilot check ride. The preflight was completed and both wing fuel tanks were filled. The engine was started, and no anomalies were noted during the startup, taxi or runup. During takeoff, the ground roll and departure were normal until the airplane reached about 300 ft above ground level (agl) when the engine started to lose power. The flight instructor took control of the airplane and added full rich mixture and ensured that the throttle lever was at full power. Momentarily, there was increase in rpm before the engine lost all power. He executed a forced landing that caused the landing gear to collapse and damaged the right wing, which resulted in the fuel tank leaking onsite. The postaccident examination revealed that the gascolator bowl bail wire attachment end was not engaged in the outboard attachment hole on the gascolator housing and was resting on the gascolator bracket forward of the hole. There was no observable impact damage to the gascolator or the surrounding area. The gascolator bowl was not sealed to the gascolator housing and was twisted inboard where the bowl’s sump was pointing forward, instead of its normal position pointing outboard towards the cowling sump access hole. The interior surfaces of both upper and lower cowling were covered in a light residue of oil with the exception of the cowling and firewall area beneath the gascolator. The lower engine cowling was removed. The bail wire was not safety wired in place, and the strainer bowl retaining nut was safety wired to the gascolator sump fitting. The strainer bowl retaining nut was not properly positioned on the bottom of the bowl. The gascolator bowl was removed and the seal and screen were undamaged and clear of contamination. The gascolator bowl did not contain any fuel. The gascolator bail wire was not properly attached to the housing and the gascolator bowl likely became unsealed, interrupting the fuel supply to the engine and causing the loss of engine power.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Ground collision during landing (landing roll)
  2. Fuel starvation during initial climb defining event
  3. Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during initial climb

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › Fuel filter › strainer › Incorrect service/maintenance
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › (general) › Maintenance personnel

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,200 hours in all; 1,160 in this make and model; 100 in the last 90 days; 40 in the last 30 days; 1,000 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: October 1, 2021
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 60 hours in all
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,889 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, April 1, 2023; 60.9 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,550 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O&VO-360 SER (piston); 3,889 hours total

The flight

  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 16, 5,862 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 140° at 9 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 43°F (6°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.02 inHg
  • Observation at 10:35 am from KU42, 1 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KU42 291635Z AUTO 14009KT 10SM CLR 21/06 A3002 RMK AO1 T02050063

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The NTSB has not released the docket for this case yet. The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), is usually released when the investigation is nearly complete, and the list here is refreshed when it appears. Check at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.