The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR18LA166 · Final report

Cessna 421C accident near Plant City, Florida, June 11, 2018

On June 11, 2018 at about 5:40 am local time, a 1980 Cessna 421C, registered N13RF, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff (rejected takeoff) near Plant City, Florida (Plant City Airport). It was an aerial observation flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries; 1 other was unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's delayed decision to abort the takeoff, which resulted in a runway overrun. Contributing to the accident was an engine anomaly for reasons that could not be determined based on the available information, and the pilot's failure to activate the runway lighting system before takeoff.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 11, 2018 · about 5:40 am local time
Place
Plant City, Florida · Plant City Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries; 1 other was unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 421C C, built 1980 · all 421Cs on the register
Registration
N13RF · no longer on the register · serial 421C0816
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial observation flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During takeoff on a night aerial observation flight, the pilot reported that the airplane did not accelerate adequately, and he chose to abort the takeoff. The airplane continued off the end of the runway and came to rest in a field about 750 ft past the departure end, resulting in substantial damage to the wings and fuselage. Examination revealed that the left engine turbocharger compressor air duct was disconnected from the throttle body. The right engine's engine-driven fuel pump was contaminated with water and debris and would not produce normal pressures and flow; however, whether these anomalies were present at the time of the accident or occurred as a result of or after the accident could not be determined. There were no other anomalies observed that would have precluded normal engine operation. Review of performance information revealed that, given the airplane's weight and atmospheric conditions at the time of the accident, the pilot had adequate runway available to accelerate the airplane to a decision speed, abort the takeoff, and stop on the remaining runway. Airport surveillance video revealed that the pilot did not activate the pilot-controlled runway lighting before takeoff, and tire skid marks on the runway were consistent with heavy braking within the last 200 ft of the runway's paved surface. The circumstances of the accident are consistent with the pilot's delayed decision to abort the takeoff. The pilot's failure to activate the runway lighting system before takeoff likely contributed to the accident by reducing his ability to judge the airplane's acceleration with respect to the runway distance remaining and abort the takeoff in a timely manner upon recognizing an anomaly.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Unknown or undetermined during takeoff (rejected takeoff) defining event
  2. Runway excursion during takeoff (rejected takeoff)
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during takeoff (rejected takeoff)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Delayed action › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of available resources › Pilot
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Forgotten action/omission › Pilot
  • factor Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Task monitoring/vigilance › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Runway/taxi/approach light › Decision related to condition

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot, flight engineer
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 26,486 hours in all; 606.5 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: July 10, 2017
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: ctr
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 7,530.2 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, July 27, 2017
  • Maximum gross weight: 7,500 lb
  • Seats: 3
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Continental GTSIO-520L (piston); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Continental GTSIO-520L (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: PCM Plant City FL at 5:40 am
  • Destination: IMM Immokalee FL
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 28, 3,950 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: night
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 79°F (26°C), dew point 72°F (22°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.01 inHg
  • Observation at 5:55 am from TPF, 12 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The NTSB has not released the docket for this case yet. The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), is usually released when the investigation is nearly complete, and the list here is refreshed when it appears. Check at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.