Cessna P210 accident near Daggett, California, March 20, 2011
On March 20, 2011 at about 7:34 pm local time, a Cessna P210, registered N50MC, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Daggett, California (Barstow Daggett airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 3 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot's decision to conduct the flight into a region of reported moderate to severe turbulence and icing conditions, followed by a loss of airplane control and an aerodynamic spin from which the pilot did not recover.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- March 20, 2011 · about 7:34 pm local time
- Place
- Daggett, California · Barstow Daggett · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 3 people were killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Cessna P210 Silver Eag · all P210s on the register
- Registration
- N50MC · registry record · serial P21000044
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
About 4 hours before the pilot's planned first leg of her return flight home, AIRMETs for instrument flight rules (IFR) and mountain obscuration conditions, moderate turbulence, and moderate icing were issued for the flight track region and timeframe. About 1 hour before the flight, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a center weather advisory (CWA) that warned of moderate-to-severe turbulence. There were no records that the pilot obtained a formal weather briefing. According to the pilot's husband, the pilot typically obtained preflight weather information from "aviationweather.gov," but the website does not retain records of user access. A friend of the pilot reported that the pilot was aware that "a storm was coming" into southern California on the day she was leaving, but the friend was unaware of the pilot's specific pre-flight activities or preparations. The investigation was unable to determine whether or how the pilot obtained weather information regarding her planned flight. About 5 minutes after departure on the IFR flight, a second CWA for moderate to severe turbulence for the flight track region and timeframe was issued. The flight proceeded uneventfully until an air traffic controller advised the pilot of a report of light rime icing at her altitude. The controller then broadcast an all-aircraft advisory regarding the issuance (but not content) of the second CWA and instructed pilots to contact flight service for further information. It could not be determined whether the pilot obtained any specific information regarding the CWA, but she did not request to go off frequency to contact flight service. However, she requested a higher altitude in an apparent effort to avoid the reported rime icing. About 2 minutes later, the flight was cleared to 15,000 feet, and several minutes after that, the pilot reported breaking out of the clouds at 13,300 feet. Later, an air traffic controller advised the pilot of a re-route, and she reported that she had encountered moderate turbulence at 15,000 feet. About 3 minutes after that, radar data indicated that the airplane was descending at nearly 12,000 feet per minute and, very shortly thereafter, the airplane was lost from air traffic control radio and radar contact. Several ground eyewitnesses reported observing the airplane in a spin and in a vertical trajectory toward the ground, in an area where the local ceiling was about 12,000 feet above ground level. Although the airplane was substantially damaged by postcrash fire, the evidence indicated that the airplane impacted the ground in an aerodynamic spin. The investigation was unable to determine the specific reasons for the loss of control and resulting aerodynamic spin. Postaccident examination of the engine, propeller, and airframe did not reveal any preexisting mechanical deficiencies or failures that would have precluded normal operation or continued flight. The airplane aerodynamic configuration and weight distribution were significantly modified via several supplemental type certificates (STCs) relative to the original FAA-certificated configuration. Neither the FAA nor any of the STC holders evaluated the individual or combined effects of the STC changes on the airplane's spin susceptibility, characteristics, or recovery capability. Evaluation of the mass properties of the modified airplane indicated that it would be more resistant to spin recovery than it would be as originally configured. However, the investigation was unable to determine if this played a role in the pilot’s inability to recover from the aerodynamic spin. On May 24, 2012, the NTSB issued Safety Recommendations A-12-21 through -23 to the FAA to address the potential adverse effects on an airplane’s performance and structure if it has multiple STCs that are not properly analyzed for compatibility. Toxicological testing by the FAA Civil Aeronautical Medical Institute detected Nortriptyline in the pilot's liver. This is a prescription antidepressant used in the treatment of major depression and for certain chronic pain conditions; it is not normally used for intermittent pain. The pilot did not report the medication during her FAA medical certification examination or on her medical certificate application; pilots taking this medication are not eligible for FAA medical certification. A warning associated with this medication stated that it may impair mental and/or physical ability required for the performance of potentially hazardous tasks. However, the degree to which the pilot may have been impaired from the medication could not be determined.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Unknown or undetermined during enroute (cruise) defining event
- Unknown or undetermined during uncontrolled descent
The NTSB's findings
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence › Convective turbulence › Effect on operation
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › (general) › (general) › Effect on operation
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to structural icing › Not specified
- cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Configuration › Not specified
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 1,100 hours in all; 400 in this make and model
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Maximum gross weight: 4,016 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine: Rolls Royce 250 (turboprop); 0 hours total
- Fire on the ground
The flight
- Departed from: SNA Santa Ana CA at 7:00 pm
- Destination: HDN Henderson NV
- Flight plan: IFR
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 080° at 5 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: scat at 11,000 ft
- Temperature: 61°F (16°C), dew point 28°F (-2°C)
- Altimeter: 29.76 inHg
- Observation at 7:51 pm from DAG, 2 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 2 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.
Other NTSB records under N50MC the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
