Extra NG accident near St. Augustine, Florida, March 2, 2022
On March 2, 2022 at about 10:02 pm local time, a 2021 Extra NG, registered N100NG, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near St. Augustine, Florida (Northeast Florida Rgnl airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s excessive airspeed during landing, which resulted in a runway excursion and collision with terrain. Contributing to the accident was the loss of engine power for undetermined reasons and contributing to the severity of the accident were the environmental challenges related to the airplane’s location in a marsh, which increased the emergency response time.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- March 2, 2022 · about 10:02 pm local time
- Place
- St. Augustine, Florida · Northeast Florida Rgnl · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Extra NG, built 2021
- Registration
- N100NG · no longer on the register · serial NG001
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The accident pilot was the lead pilot of a flight of two returning to their home base after a local flight. The pilot reported a loss of engine rpm and the pilot of the second airplane reported the accident airplane was trailing smoke. An emergency was declared, and the airplane was cleared to land. Automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) data showed the airplane crossed the airport boundary at an altitude of 200 ft with a groundspeed of 165 knots. The recommended speed for a precautionary landing with engine power is 90 knots. The pilot overflew the runway, and the airplane came to rest inverted in a marsh, about 1,500 ft past the end of the runway. The airplane was not visible from shore. First responders used multiple boats and a drone to search for the airplane; however, shallow water and the terrain slowed responders’ progress. A good Samaritan, who first located the airplane, provided assistance to the pilot and guided emergency responders to the airplane. During the time responders searched for and extricated the pilot the tide continued to rise and submerged the pilot before extrication. Downloaded engine data indicated an increase in cylinder head temperature (CHT) in the No. 4 cylinder followed by loss of oil pressure, a drop in exhaust gas temperature (EGT), and a decrease in engine power to 50%. The No. 4 cylinder exhibited low compression and suction during the postaccident examination, which was most likely due to environmental debris from the accident sequence that was found on the valve seat. No other anomalies were found during the examination that would have resulted in the loss of engine power. Review of postaccident medical records, including the autopsy data and toxicology reports, revealed no medical issues that would have contributed to the accident. Although the toxicology detected therapeutic levels of the unapproved antidepressant vilazodone, which is associated with side effects such as dizziness, it is unknown how long the pilot was taking this medication or the severity of her depression. Given the pilot’s actions during the flight, it is unlikely that effects from this medication or the pilot’s depression were factors in this accident. The metabolite of naltrexone, 6-beta-natrexol, was detected but not quantified, suggesting that any effects from the use of naltrexone were likely minimal and not a factor in this accident. ADS-B data revealed the airplane crossed over the runway threshold at a significantly higher airspeed than recommended in the pilot’s operating handbook. It’s likely the pilot’s perceived emergency and urgency to land led to the excessive airspeed on final approach and inability to touchdown on the runway.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Landing area overshoot during landing defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of checklist › Pilot
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
- Environmental issues › Physical environment › Runway/land/takeoff/taxi surface › (general) › Contributed to outcome
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Flight time: 350 hours in all; 25 in this make and model; 25 in the last 90 days
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rear
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 90.5 hours
- Last inspection: condition inspection, August 3, 2021; 62 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 2,095 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming AEIO-580-B1A (piston); 152 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: 42J Keystone Heights FL at 9:45 pm
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 13, 8,000 ft by 150 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 070° at 6 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 41°F (5°C)
- Altimeter: 30.13 inHg
- Observation at 4:56 pm from SGJ, 1 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KSGJ 022156Z 07006KT 10SM CLR 21/05 A3013 RMK AO2 SLP200 T02060050
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
17 documents, released by the NTSB on March 6, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
