Cessna 177RG accident near Salinas, Puerto Rico, July 24, 2020
On July 24, 2020 at about 2:02 pm local time, a 1971 Cessna 177RG, registered N1813Q, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Salinas, Puerto Rico. It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
Contamination and corrosion within the fuel system that resulted in a blockage, starvation of fuel to the engine, and the total loss of engine power.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- July 24, 2020 · about 2:02 pm local time
- Place
- Salinas, Puerto Rico · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Cessna 177RG No Series, built 1971 · all 177RGs on the register
- Registration
- N1813Q · no longer on the register · serial 177RG0213
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot/owner and the instructor were conducting an instructional flight. The pilot reported finding no water contamination of the fuel during his preflight inspection of the airplane. They departed, performed airwork, and flew to an airport where several landings were performed. The flight then proceeded toward another airport, and during cruise flight at 1,100 ft mean sea level, the engine lost power. The pilot attempted to restore power but was unsuccessful. During the subsequent off-airport forced landing in soft terrain, the airplane nosed over during the landing roll. After the airplane was recovered, small amounts of water were found in samples taken from each fuel tank, the reservoir tank assembly, and the airframe fuel strainer. The fuel tanks were then drained and found to contain about 29 gallons of fuel; the drained fuel did not contain water or contaminants. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed severe contamination of the servo fuel injector inlet screen by ferrous material, as well as evidence of corrosion and water. Additionally, evidence of foreign debris contamination, water, and/or corrosion were found in the fuel strainer, the internal steel valves of the engine-driven fuel pump, and components of the fuel flow divider. No issues were otherwise noted with the engine powertrain, ignition, induction, or exhaust systems. During postaccident testing, leakage was noted from the right fuel cap. The most recent annual inspection was completed about 8 months before the accident. Following the first flight after the annual inspection, the pilot reported discrepancies to maintenance personnel regarding water in the fuel tanks, a rough running engine (which was later attributed to water ingestion), and a slow draining right fuel tank sump drain valve. The discrepancies were addressed by removing fuel tank sealant from the right-wing fuel tank drain valve boss ports and resealing the right inlet plate to the upper wing skin. According to the pilot, resealing the plate corrected the water intrusion issue. Given this information it is likely that the fuel system had been exposed to water for a period that was long enough for significant amounts of corrosion to develop. Ultimately, this resulted in the accumulation of corrosion and debris throughout the fuel system that most likely resulted in a blockage of the fuel injector inlet screen and/or fuel flow divider, fuel starvation, and the total loss of engine power during the accident flight. While the blockage of the servo fuel injector inlet screen occurred over time, it likely did not exist at the time of the airplane’s last annual inspection. The undetected blockage of the right wing fuel tank sump drain valve boss likely existed at the time of the last annual inspection, and may have contributed to the long-term water exposure and on-going water contamination issues after the annual inspection was completed.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Off-field or emergency landing during enroute (descent)
- Nose over/nose down during landing (landing roll)
- Fuel starvation during enroute (cruise) defining event
- Fuel contamination during prior to flight
The NTSB's findings
- Environmental issues › Physical environment › Terrain › (general) › Contributed to outcome
- Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid condition
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › Fuel filter › strainer › Capability exceeded
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › (general) › Fatigue/wear/corrosion
Flight instructor
- Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; multi-engine sea; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 17,287 hours in all; 25 in this make and model; 50 in the last 90 days; 20 in the last 30 days; 17,067 as pilot in command; 5,174 on instruments
- Last flight review: October 5, 2018
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: no injuries
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 384 hours in all; 96 in this make and model; 2 in the last 90 days; 2 in the last 30 days; 255 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: November 22, 2019
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 3,296.8 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, November 8, 2019
- Maximum gross weight: 2,800 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine: Lycoming IO-360-A1B6D (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: TJPS Ponce PR at 1:49 pm
- Destination: TJRV Ceiba PR
- Flight plan: none
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 110° at 10 knots
- Visibility: 7 statute miles
- Sky: broken clouds at 5,000 ft; a few clouds at 2,800 ft
- Temperature: 84°F (29°C), dew point 75°F (24°C)
- Altimeter: 30.04 inHg
- Observation at 1:53 pm from TJNR, 41 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 2 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
10 documents, released by the NTSB on August 31, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 20 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Record of NTSB Conversations | PDF, 16 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Statement from Owner | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 4 | FAA Inspector Statement | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Excerpts of Maintenance Records | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Excerpt of Checklist Used at Last Annual Inspection | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 7 | Investigative Photographs | PDF, 13 pages | View Download |
| 8 | Engine Monitor Device Download Factual Report | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 9 | Tabular Data for Engine Monitor Device Download Factual Report | data file | Download |
| 10 | Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15, and Evidence Control Forms | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
