The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA19FA265 · Final report

Amateur-built RV-12 accident near Lady Lake, Florida, September 6, 2019

On September 6, 2019 at about 5:12 pm local time, a 2010 amateur-built RV-12, registered N767FS, was destroyed in an accident during approach (VFR pattern downwind) near Lady Lake, Florida (Love Field). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's loss of pitch control due to the in-flight opening of the canopy for reasons that could not be determined.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 6, 2019 · about 5:12 pm local time · cases in 2019
Place
Lady Lake, Florida · Love Field · cases near this airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built RV-12 No Series, built 2010
Registration
N767FS · no longer on the register · serial 120053
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot departed with the intent of remaining in the airport traffic pattern. Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) data indicated that the airplane departed and climbed to an altitude of about 1,000 ft above ground level. Near the end of the downwind leg, the airplane entered a brief 50-ft climb, followed by a rapid descent to impact with the ground. Examination of the engine and airframe revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation. Examination of the canopy roll bar and the tip-up canopy bow, which are connected in flight when the canopy is latched, indicated that they deformed in a dissimilar manner at impact. The roll bar and canopy bow were located about 12 ft apart at the accident site, and there was little damage to the handle and latch block, indicating that the canopy was likely not latched at the time of impact. Examination of the canopy and latch handle revealed that the handle and washers did not match any of the manufacturer’s drawings. The kit manufacturer issued a service letter about 3 years before the accident advising that, in the event of an inflight opening of a forward opening, tip-up canopy, the airplane would “most likely pitch down abruptly.” The pilot had recently modified the latch on the airplane’s tip-up canopy. The pilot had purchased a latch replacement kit from the airplane manufacturer; however, only the handle from the new latch kit was installed at the time of the accident, and additional washers that were not part of the kit had been added, likely to compensate for the longer dimensions of the new handle assembly. Whether full engagement of the latching mechanism could be achieved in this configuration could not be determined. Additionally, it could not be determined whether the pilot departed with the canopy unlatched or it became unlatched in flight, but it is likely that when the pilot reduced engine power to begin a descent for landing, the canopy opened enough to affect the airplane’s pitch control, resulting in a subsequent abrupt descent and impact with terrain.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Inflight upset during approach (VFR pattern downwind)
  2. Loss of control in flight during approach (VFR pattern downwind) defining event
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Pitch control › Attain/maintain not possible
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Windows › windshield system › Flight compartment windows › Unintentional use/operation other cases naming the airframe structure
  • cause Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 10,075 hours in all; 102 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: November 8, 2017
  • Medical certificate: BasicMed
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 123.8 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, July 1, 2019; 0 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,320 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rotax 912ULS (piston); 124 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: 97FL Lady Lake FL at 5:10 pm
  • Destination: 97FL Lady Lake FL
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 27, 2,500 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 270° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 4,100 ft
  • Temperature: 91°F (33°C), dew point 72°F (22°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.90 inHg
  • Observation at 4:53 pm from LEE, 8 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Photographs from the investigation 5 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

21 documents, released by the NTSB on November 4, 2021. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Witness Statements PDF, 10 pages · our copy View Download
2 Summary of Van's Aircraft Correspondence PDF, 2 pages · our copy View Download
3 Pilot Logbook Excerpts PDF, 13 pages · our copy View Download
4 Insurance Application Showing Pilot Hours PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
5 POH Excerpts PDF, 2 pages · our copy View Download
6 Maintenance Logbook Excerpts PDF, 20 pages · our copy View Download
7 Accident Airplane Canopy and Latch Assembly Excerpts PDF, 3 pages · our copy View Download
8 Canopy Latch Upgrade Notification PDF, 14 pages · our copy View Download
9 Van's Tip-up Canopies Service Letter PDF, 2 pages · our copy View Download
10 Lancair Legacy Canopy Safety Issues White Paper PDF, 47 pages · our copy View Download
11 Area Weather Reports PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
12 ADS-B Flight Path PDF, 2 pages · our copy View Download
13 ADS-B Tabular Data data file · our copy Download
14 Photo Array PDF, 6 pages · our copy View Download
15 Airframe and Engine Examination Notes PDF, 8 pages · our copy View Download
16 Canopy Examination Notes PDF, 5 pages · our copy View Download
17 Toxicological Report PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
18 Materials Laboratory Factual Report 19-056 PDF, 2 pages · our copy View Download
19 Electronic Devices - Specialist's Factual Report PDF, 4 pages · our copy View Download
20 Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation PDF, 9 pages · our copy View Download
21 Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 PDF, 5 pages · our copy View Download

The same docket at the NTSB.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/ERA19FA265.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.