The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA15LA186 · Final report

Piper PA-28-235 accident near Woodstock, Georgia, March 21, 2015

On March 21, 2015 at about 10:07 pm local time, a 1964 Piper PA-28-235, registered N8803W, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (landing roll) near Woodstock, Georgia (Air Acres airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to attain the proper touchdown point on the short, wet, turf runway. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s use of a high approach speed.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 21, 2015 · about 10:07 pm local time
Place
Woodstock, Georgia · Air Acres · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA-28-235, built 1964 · all PA-28-235s on the register
Registration
N8803W · no longer on the register · serial 28-10328
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The airline transport pilot was conducting a personal cross-country flight. The pilot reported that he landed the airplane with the flaps fully extended on the short, wet, turf runway and that the hand-actuated brakes were ineffective at touchdown but that they became effective after he pumped them several times with about 300 ft of runway remaining. A witness at the airport reported that the airplane was "too high for the approach and too fast" and that the airplane touched down midfield and then "bounced-ballooned" down the runway, skidding on the turf each time it touched down. The airplane continued off the departure end of the runway, traveled down an embankment, nosed over, and then came to rest inverted. Intermittent tire skid marks from about midfield (1,000 ft) to the crash site were visible, consistent with the witness's statement. About 8.5 flight hours before the accident, the brakes were replaced, and the brake fluid system was bled. According to the airplane manufacturer, although the method that the mechanic reported that he used to bleed the brakes was not in accordance with the manufacturer's maintenance manual, it achieved the desired results, and the airplane owner stated that the performance of the brakes since their replacement was satisfactory. Postaccident examination of the brake handle revealed that there was no pressure when the brake handle was actuated but that brake pressure would build if the handle was pumped. The airplane's brake reservoir was open at the top, and the fill line for the reservoir was well below the top of the container, which would have allowed air in the system to escape. Consequently, during the time the airplane was inverted following the accident, the air that had been in the top of the reservoir was trapped and moved to the highest point in the system, which was the brake calipers. Brake fluid would have continued to leak from the system and been replaced by air until the airplane was returned to the upright position. Because of trapped air in the system, the brakes did not function normally until the air was removed and the fluid replaced when the handle was pumped during postaccident testing.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Runway excursion during landing (landing roll) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • cause Environmental issues › Physical environment › Runway/land/takeoff/taxi surface › Wet › Effect on operation
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Descent/approach/glide path › Not attained/maintained
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Surface speed/braking › Not attained/maintained

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: glider; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: glider
  • Flight time: 28,500 hours in all; 250 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection, January 1, 2015; 8 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,900 lb
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-540 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: D73 Monroe GA at 9:35 pm
  • Destination: 5GA4 Woodstock GA
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 18, 2,000 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 330° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 12,000 ft
  • Temperature: 66°F (19°C), dew point 41°F (5°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.07 inHg
  • Observation at 9:55 pm from RYY, 9 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

9 documents, released by the NTSB on April 5, 2016. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.