The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA12FA143 · Final report

Cessna 150G accident near Fitchburg, Massachusetts, January 11, 2012

On January 11, 2012 at about 3:00 pm local time, a Cessna 150G, registered N4041J, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Fitchburg, Massachusetts (Fitchburg Municipal Airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured; 1 other was unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A partial loss of engine power due to the formation of carburetor ice and the flight instructor's improper application of carburetor heat.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 11, 2012 · about 3:00 pm local time
Place
Fitchburg, Massachusetts · Fitchburg Municipal Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured; 1 other was unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 150G · all 150Gs on the register
Registration
N4041J · no longer on the register · serial 15065341
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

On the day of the accident, the student pilot conducted a touch-and-go landing and then entered the traffic pattern to perform another one. While on the downwind leg of the traffic pattern, the engine began to run roughly, so the student applied carburetor heat and kept it on until touchdown. During climb after the second touch-and-go landing, the engine began running roughly again. Subsequently, the flight instructor took control of the airplane, lowered the angle-of-attack, and reapplied carburetor heat. According to the flight instructor, the engine subsequently ran more roughly, so he immediately placed the carburetor heat to “off.” He stated that, although the engine then ran less roughly, it still ran roughly. The flight instructor decided that there was not sufficient remaining runway to “land.” He was not sure how much power the engine was producing or if he could maintain level flight. He stated that he thought about turning back but decided against it. He said that the airplane was low and slow, so he decided to continue straight ahead. He tried to keep the airplane flying and was successful for about 15 to 20 seconds, but then he observed a warehouse ahead and banked to the right to avoid it. The airplane then settled and struck trees, substantially damaging the airplane and seriously injuring the student pilot. Examination of the airplane and engine revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical failure or malfunction that would have precluded normal operation. However, a postaccident review of weather data and a carburetor icing probability chart also revealed that, at the time of the accident, the ambient temperature and dew point favored serious icing. Industry and Federal Aviation Administration guidance advised pilots to be aware of the warning signs of carburetor ice, including loss of rpm (with a fixed-pitch propeller) and rough running (both of which occurred before the accident), and advised that the pilot should respond to these warning signs by immediately applying full carburetor heat, and that the engine may initially run roughly for a short time while the ice melts. Therefore, the flight instructor should not have turned off the carburetor heat when the engine was still running roughly after he turned it on.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (partial) during initial climb defining event
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Instructor/check pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Power plant › Air intake › Incorrect use/operation
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to carburetor icing › Effect on equipment

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,391 hours in all; 131 in this make and model; 34 in the last 90 days; 5 in the last 30 days; 1,275 as pilot in command; 362 on instruments
  • Last flight review: August 7, 2010
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 20 hours in all; 20 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,725 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, August 11, 2011
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,600 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Cont Motor 0-200-A (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Tenle Aviation

The flight

  • Departed from: FIT Fitchburg MA at 2:30 pm
  • Destination: FIT Fitchburg MA
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 32, 4,510 ft by 100 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 10,000 ft
  • Temperature: 32°F (0°C), dew point 39°F (4°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.12 inHg
  • Observation at 2:52 pm from FIT, 3 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew11

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.