The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA11LA466 · Final report

Piper PA46 accident near Manasses, Virginia, August 19, 2011

On August 19, 2011 at about 7:55 pm local time, a Piper PA46, registered N133SR, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (landing roll) near Manasses, Virginia (Manassas Regional Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

An undetermined nose landing gear steering anomaly or anomalies, which resulted in the pilot's inability to maintain directional control of the airplane during the landing rollout. The damage to the nose landing gear precluded a determination of the cause of the nose landing gear anomaly.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 19, 2011 · about 7:55 pm local time
Place
Manasses, Virginia · Manassas Regional Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA46 500TP · all PA46s on the register
Registration
N133SR · registry record · serial 4697114
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The airplane landed on runway 16 with the wind from 220 degrees true at 4 knots. The pilot reported that he landed on the centerline and kept the nosewheel off the runway for 3 to 4 seconds. The nosewheel then touched down, and 3 to 4 seconds later, the airplane started veering to the left. The pilot first added some right rudder, and because the heading did not correct, he added more right rudder. When the heading still wouldn't correct, he "jumped" on the brakes and put the propeller into Beta and reverse. The airplane subsequently veered off the left side of the runway and into the median, where the nose landing gear separated from the airframe. Skid marks on the runway and in the grass were consistent with the pilot's recollection of the accident. The airplane had completed an annual inspection 20 days earlier, in which the nosewheel bearings were replaced. Postflight examination of the nosewheel revealed that it rotated freely and that the bearings appeared pristine with new bearing grease. The pilot also noted that he had not checked the tire pressures since the annual inspection, but had visually inspected the tires during preflight inspections. The airframe manufacturer determined that certain anomalies can reduce optimum steering capability in the make and model of the airplane, such as an underinflated nose landing gear tire, improper nose landing gear rake angle, excessive clearance between the nose landing gear steering arm and nose gear rollers, and low rudder cable tension. The airplane was examined 6 days after the accident, and the nosewheel tire pressure indicated 55 psi; a fully inflated tire should indicate 70 psi. Tire manufacturers estimate that up to a 5 percent reduction of tire pressure per day is normal, and even after continued losses after a period of time, an underinflated tire could still appear to be normally inflated. Given that the pilot had not checked the tire pressure in the 20 days before the accident, the nosewheel tire was likely underinflated (due to normal air loss) at the time of the accident; however, the tire pressure at the time of the accident could not be determined, and it could not be determined if it could have contributed to the loss of directional control. In addition, the three other detrimental effects on steering stability could not be measured because the nose landing gear separated from the airframe during the accident. Because of the benign landing conditions and the pilot's aeronautical experience, it is unlikely that the loss of directional control resulted from his piloting skills; it was more likely that it resulted from one or a combination of the four detrimental effects on steering stability. .

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control on ground during landing (landing roll) defining event
  2. Runway excursion during landing (landing roll)
  3. Landing gear collapse during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Landing gear steering system › Malfunction
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Attain/maintain not possible
  • cause Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Nose/tail landing gear › Not specified

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,612 hours in all; 130 in this make and model; 32 in the last 90 days; 14 in the last 30 days; 2,318 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: August 3, 2011
  • Medical certificate: Class 3
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,916 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, July 29, 2011; 13 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 4,892 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Pratt And Whitney PT6A-42A (turboprop); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: RYY Atlanta GA at 5:45 pm
  • Destination: HEF Manasses VA
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 16L, 5,700 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 220° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 3,600 ft
  • Temperature: 86°F (30°C), dew point 68°F (20°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.87 inHg
  • Observation at 7:55 pm from HEF

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.