The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DEN06CA054 · Final report

Cessna 170B accident near Benton, Kansas, March 31, 2006

On March 31, 2006 at about 7:00 pm local time, a Cessna 170B, registered N2359J, was substantially damaged in an accident near Benton, Kansas (Benton airport). It was a positioning flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

the pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the airplane resulting in a ground loop. Contributing factors include the inadequate preflight inspection, the pilot's failure to properly latch the cowling, and the pilot's diverted attention to the open cowling.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 31, 2006 · about 7:00 pm local time
Place
Benton, Kansas · Benton · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 170B · all 170Bs on the register
Registration
N2359J · no longer on the register · serial 20511
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Positioning flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot had just departed when the cowling came open and he elected to return to the airport. The pilot stated that during the landing roll he lost control of the airplane, ground looped and departed the runway to the left, resulting in substantial damage to the right wing. A post-accident examination of the airframe and airplane's systems revealed no anomalies. The pilot stated that he did not properly latch the cowling.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,961 hours in all; 71 in this make and model; 7 in the last 90 days; 1 in the last 30 days; 1,800 as pilot in command; 200 on instruments
  • Last flight review: July 1, 2004
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,670 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, December 1, 2005
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,200 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental C-145 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: 1355 Benton KS at 6:50 pm
  • Destination: 71K Wichita KS
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 35, 1,613 ft by 40 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 270° at 8 knots, gusting 16
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 66°F (19°C), dew point 36°F (2°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.04 inHg
  • Observation at 7:54 pm from AAO, 5 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N2359J the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1992-07-22LAX92FA313 · accident near Fall River Mill, CA · destroyed · fatal

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.