The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CHI06LA062 · Final report

Beech A100 accident near Sault Ste Marie, Michigan, January 5, 2006

On January 5, 2006 at about 7:00 am local time, a Beech A100, registered N700NC, was substantially damaged in an accident near Sault Ste Marie, Michigan (Sault Ste Marie/Sanderson airport). It was a positioning flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The inadequate in-flight decision to continue the approach to land, directional control not maintained, and the contaminated runway. Contributing factors were flight to destination alternate not performed, a notice to airman not issued by airport personnel relating to snow/slush contamination of the runway, and the snow bank that the airplane impacted during the landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 5, 2006 · about 7:00 am local time
Place
Sault Ste Marie, Michigan · Sault Ste Marie/Sanderson · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Beech A100 · all A100s on the register
Registration
N700NC · no longer on the register · serial B-138
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Positioning flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The airplane, operated as an emergency medical flight, received substantial damage when it veered off the edge of runway 32 (5,235 feet long by 100 foot wide asphalt, slush and snow covered) and impacted a snow bank during landing roll at a non 14 CFR Part 139 airport. Night instrument meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The pilot stated that during a nonprecision approach while two miles from the runway, he observed it to be completely covered in snow and slush. He continued the approach and upon touchdown the airplane decelerated in deep slush and veered to the left after a rollout of 1,200 feet. The pilot reported that prior to accepting the emergency medical flight, he obtained a weather briefing from a flight service station during which time no notices to airman (NOTAMs) existed that pertained to the destination airport. The pilot reported that he knew the airport was getting rain and was expecting the runway to be clear. He was surprised that the runway was covered with heavy slush. The airport manager stated that the runway was covered with wet, slushy snow as there had been periods of wet snow and rain that occurred late the previous day and evening of the accident. The airport weather observation recorded the presence of light snow in a period of approximately 24 hours before the accident. The pilot "wondered" why no NOTAM was issued relating to the runway condition. The Airport Facility Directory and the FAA's web site provides a list of 14 CFR Part 139 airports which are inherently required to issue NOTAMs. However, Advisory Circular 150/5200-28C states, the management of a public use airport is expected to make known, as soon as practical, any condition on or in the vicinity of an airport, existing or anticipated, that will prevent, restrict, or present a hazard during the arrival or departure of aircraft. Airport management is responsible for observing and reporting the condition of airport movement areas. Public notification is usually accomplished through the NOTAM system. The Aeronautical Information Manual, states that NOTAM information is information that could affect a pilot's decision to make a flight. It includes information such as airport or primary runway closures, changes in the status of navigational aids, ILS's, radar service availability, and other information essential to planned en route, terminal, or landing operations.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 7,620 hours in all; 70 in this make and model; 71 in the last 90 days; 23 in the last 30 days; 7,500 as pilot in command; 0 on instruments
  • Last flight review: October 1, 2005
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 13,033 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, September 1, 2005
  • Maximum gross weight: 11,500 lb
  • Seats: 10
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Pratt & Whitney PT6-28 (turboprop); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Pratt & Whitney PT6-28 (turboprop); 0 hours total
  • Operator: North Country Aviation, Inc

The flight

  • Departed from: TVC Traverse City MI at 6:10 am
  • Destination: ANJ Sault Ste Marie MI
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 32, 5,235 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: night, dark
  • Wind: from 340° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 2.5 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 1,300 ft
  • Temperature: 32°F (0°C), dew point 32°F (0°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.70 inHg
  • Observation at 6:55 am from ANJ

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew1
Passengers2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.