Amateur-built RV-10 accident near Capron, Illinois, June 28, 2025
On June 28, 2025 at about 2:34 pm local time, a 2019 amateur-built RV-10, registered N847CS, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering near Capron, Illinois. It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The NTSB has not yet published a probable cause for this accident. Investigations usually take one to two years; this page updates when the final report is released.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- June 28, 2025 · about 2:34 pm local time
- Place
- Capron, Illinois · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 2 people were killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Amateur-built RV-10, built 2019
- Registration
- N847CS · registry record · serial 40325
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative preliminary · quoted from the NTSB record
On June 28, 2025, about 0934 central daylight time, a Vans RV-10 airplane, N847CS, was substantially damaged during an accident near Capron, Illinois. The pilot and flight instructor were fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 instructional flight. The purpose of the flight was for the pilot to complete a flight review with the flight instructor. According to automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) flight data, at 0909:06, the airplane departed runway 23 at Waukegan National Airport (UGN), Waukegan, Illinois. After takeoff, the airplane flew to the west and climbed to about 3,300 ft mean sea level (msl) where the flight track was consistent with maneuvers that are often associated with flight reviews. After the maneuvers, the airplane continued flying to the west until 0931:53, when it entered a right descending turn from about 3,000 ft msl. The airplane completed two 360° turns, over a period of 1 minute 40 seconds, as it continued to descend. Beginning at 0933:33, the airplane briefly flew northwest about 0.3 nautical miles (nm) while it continued to descend. About 13 seconds later, the airplane flew over Capron Road, a north-south road, about 590 ft above ground level (agl) before it entered a right turn to the east and continued to descend. At 0934:03, the airplane crossed over Capron Road for a second time, on an east heading. As of the final ADS-B data return at 0934:05, the airplane was about 315 ft agl and 154 ft west of the accident site. Preliminary aircraft performance calculations indicated that as of the final ADS-B return, the airplane had decelerated to about 54 knots calibrated airspeed (KCAS) and was descending about 2,850 feet per minute (fpm). There were no witnesses to the accident. The airplane impacted a cornfield on a west heading. The corn damage was generally circular with a diameter consistent with the airplane’s wingspan. Based on the impact crater and the minimal lateral damage to the corn, the airplane impacted the ground while in a steep nose-down pitch attitude. All structural components and flight control surfaces were located at the accident site. Elevator and aileron flight control continuity could not be confirmed due to impact-related damage; however, all observed separations to the flight control push/pull tubes and rod end bearings were consistent with overstress. Rudder cable continuity was confirmed from the cockpit pedals to the rudder control horn. Each flap remained attached to its respective wing; however, due to impact-related damage the flap setting was not determined during the onsite examination. Both wing fuel tanks ruptured during impact, but there was evidence of fuel blight observed on the corn leaves surrounding the accident site. The airframe fuel lines were also damaged during impact, but residual fuel was observed at the fuel selector and the fuel line between the engine-driven fuel pump and the fuel servo. The engine-driven fuel pump discharged fuel when operated by hand. The fuel servo’s inlet fuel screen was not contaminated with debris and remained wet with residual fuel. The fuel flow transducer separated from the engine but was otherwise undamaged, and blown air passed through the fuel flow transducer without restriction. The engine was found partially buried in the impact crater. A visual examination of the engine did not reveal any crankcase or cylinder fractures. Internal engine and valve train continuity was confirmed as the engine crankshaft was rotated through the propeller governor drive gear. The engine rear accessory gear section rotated freely. Compression and suction were noted on all six cylinders in conjunction with crankshaft rotation. An unquantified amount of engine oil remained in sump. The screw-on oil filter was found separated from the rear accessory section. The engine was equipped with two electronic magnetos that were not tested during the onsite examination. The top sparkplugs exhibited features consistent with normal engine operation. The fuel distribution valve and associated fuel injector lines exhibited impact-related damage. The fuel injectors were found attached to their respective fuel injector line, and each fuel injector was found properly installed in its respective cylinder head. The fuel injectors were clear of debris. The fuel servo exhibited significant impact-related damage. The engine examination revealed no evidence of a mechanical malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation. The two-blade propeller remained attached to the engine crankshaft. One of the two propeller blades was found completely buried in the soil; however, when recovered the propeller blade exhibited an S-shaped spanwise bend, chordwise scratches, burnishing, and leading-edge damage. The other propeller blade remained relatively straight and exhibited minor chordwise scratches. The airplane’s damaged primary flight display (PFD), multifunction display (MFD), electronic attitude indicator, and digital navigation/communication device were shipped to the NTSB Vehicle Recorder Laboratory for examination and possible data extraction. The airplane wreckage was recovered from the accident site to a secure location.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Aerodynamic stall/spin during maneuvering defining event
The aircraft
- Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
- Maximum gross weight: 2,700 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
The flight
- Departed from: UGN Waukegan IL at 2:09 pm
- Flight plan: none
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 150° at 7 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: a few clouds at 25,000 ft
- Temperature: 75°F (24°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
- Altimeter: 30.06 inHg
- Observation at 9:54 am from KRFD, 22 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KRFD 281454Z 15007KT 10SM FEW250 24/18 A3006 RMK AO2 SLP173 T02440178 58005
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 2 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
The NTSB has not released the docket for this case yet. The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), is usually released when the investigation is nearly complete, and the list here is refreshed when it appears. Check at the NTSB.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
