The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN18LA197 · Final report

Fairchild(Howard) M 62C(PT-23A) accident near Wichita, Kansas, May 28, 2018

On May 28, 2018 at about 5:10 pm local time, a 1943 Fairchild(Howard) M 62C(PT-23A), registered N64176, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern final) near Wichita, Kansas (Westport airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion, which resulted from the pilot’s miscalculation of the fuel consumption rate during preflight planning.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 28, 2018 · about 5:10 pm local time
Place
Wichita, Kansas · Westport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Fairchild(Howard) M 62C(PT-23A) UNDESIGNAT, built 1943 · all M 62C(PT-23A)s on the register
Registration
N64176 · registry record · serial 256H0
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The private pilot reported that he filled the airplane with fuel 5 days before the accident flight. He had not flown the airplane in the intervening 5 days, and the fuel indicators were still showing that the tanks were full before the accident flight. The pilot calculated that there should have been sufficient fuel onboard for a 3-hour 15-minute-long flight. The pilot was performing flyovers at five cemeteries, which required flying holding orbits at three of the cemeteries and two passes at the other two cemeteries. He then flew back toward the departure airport to land. When the airplane was about 5 minutes from the airport, he switched fuel tanks to what appeared to be the fullest tank. He reported that the fuel level in both fuel tanks was low but that the fuel quantity indicators were showing above “E.” While on final approach, between 150 and 200 ft above the ground, the engine lost total power. He switched fuel tanks and started using the manual pump, and the engine regained power for 1 to 2 seconds before losing power again. He subsequently conducted an off-airport, forced landing in a lot about 1/8 mile from the end of the runway. The airplane touched down hard and bounced, and the right wing hit a pole. The airplane then impacted a fence and another pole before coming to rest. The pilot used a flight tracker program, and it showed that the flight was only 2 hours 41 minutes long. Postaccident examination of the accident site found no fuel spillage. Examination of the airplane revealed that each fuel tank contained about 1/2 cup of fuel. About a teaspoon of fuel was recovered from the engine strainer bowl. Although the pilot thought there was sufficient fuel onboard the airplane for the flight, given the evidence, it is likely that the engine lost power due to fuel exhaustion because the pilot miscalculated the fuel consumption rate during preflight planning.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel exhaustion during approach (VFR pattern final) defining event
  2. Loss of engine power (total) during approach (VFR pattern final)
  3. Attempted remediation/recovery during approach (VFR pattern final)
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during approach (VFR pattern final)
  5. Off-field or emergency landing during landing
  6. Hard landing during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid level
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Fuel planning › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Fence/fence post › Contributed to outcome
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Pole › Contributed to outcome

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,074 hours in all; 29 in this make and model; 13 in the last 90 days; 6 in the last 30 days; 1,000 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: May 2, 2016
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,391.1 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 1, 2018; 17 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,900 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental W670-16 (piston); 1,943 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: 71K Wichita KS at 2:30 pm
  • Destination: 71K Wichita KS
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 150° at 13 knots, gusting 21
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 5,000 ft
  • Temperature: 90°F (32°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.92 inHg
  • Observation at 4:53 pm from ICT, 2 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

3 documents, released by the NTSB on December 12, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.