The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN13LA366 · Final report

Israel Aircraft Industries 1124 accident near Cincinnati, Ohio, June 18, 2013

On June 18, 2013 at about 3:25 pm local time, a Israel Aircraft Industries 1124, registered N112EM, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff near Cincinnati, Ohio (Cincinnati Municipal Airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Loss of control due to insufficient airspeed on takeoff and premature landing gear retraction, which resulted in the collapse of the left landing gear as the airplane impacted the runway.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 18, 2013 · about 3:25 pm local time
Place
Cincinnati, Ohio · Cincinnati Municipal Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Israel Aircraft Industries 1124 · all 1124s on the register
Registration
N112EM · registry record · serial 336
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The flight instructor and pilot were conducting initial training for a type certification. As the airplane touched down on the first landing, the flight instructor directed a touch-and-go landing. During takeoff, the airplane settled back to the runway and the right wingtip struck the runway, most likely due to insufficient airspeed. The airplane subsequently yawed left, the left main gear collapsed, and the airplane skidded to a stop on the runway. Examination and testing of the landing gear system revealed no anomalies. No damage occurred to the side or jury brace of the left main landing gear, which would be expected following a mechanical failure. Based on this lack of damage and no anomalies with the landing gear system, it is likely that the landing gear handle had been moved to the "up" position during the takeoff sequence.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Abnormal runway contact during takeoff
  2. Landing gear collapse during takeoff
  3. Loss of control in flight during takeoff defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Main landing gear › Incorrect use/operation
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Instructor/check pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: glider; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 20,000 hours in all; 3,000 in this make and model; 90 in the last 90 days; 30 in the last 30 days; 20,000 as pilot in command; 20,000 on instruments
  • Last flight review: June 9, 2013
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 3,621 hours in all; 0 in this make and model; 7 in the last 90 days; 7 in the last 30 days; 1,388 as pilot in command; 680 on instruments
  • Last flight review: February 20, 2013
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 7,522 hours
  • Last inspection: approved inspection programme, October 11, 2011
  • Maximum gross weight: 23,000 lb
  • Seats: 8
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Garrett TFE 731 SER (turbofan); 7,469 hours total
  • Engine 2: Garrett TFE 731 SER (turbofan); 7,322 hours total
  • Operator: E Micah Aviation INC

The flight

  • Departed from: KLUK Cincinnati OH at 2:45 pm
  • Destination: KLUK Cincinnati OH
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 21L, 6,101 ft by 150 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: at 3 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 6,500 ft; a few clouds at 1,200 ft
  • Temperature: 72°F (22°C), dew point 66°F (19°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.93 inHg
  • Observation at 2:53 pm from KLUK

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number CEN13LA366.