The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB CEN11FA133 · Final report

Piper PA-46-310P accident near Milaca, Minnesota, December 30, 2010

On December 30, 2010 at about 3:58 pm local time, a Piper PA-46-310P, registered N9103N, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (climb to cruise) near Milaca, Minnesota. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot did not recover from an unusual attitude while operating in instrument meteorological conditions following a disconnect of the autopilot system for undetermined reasons. Contributing to the accident were the pilot’s lack of recent flight experience and impairment due to diphenhydramine.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
December 30, 2010 · about 3:58 pm local time
Place
Milaca, Minnesota · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Piper PA-46-310P · all PA-46-310Ps on the register
Registration
N9103N · registry record · serial 4608021
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

About 20 minutes after departing on a cross-country flight, the pilot acknowledged the air traffic controller’s clearance to climb to 17,000 feet mean sea level (msl). Radar data indicated that the airplane reached a maximum altitude of 16,800 feet msl. The airplane then entered a right descending turn followed by a left descending turn. While in the left turn, the pilot informed the controller, “I lost my autopilot; I’m in an unusual attitude.” The pilot stated this same information two more times in response to transmissions by the controller. The pilot’s last transmission was that he was busy trying to recover the airplane. Witnesses heard the airplane flying overhead for several minutes, but they could not see it due to the low ceiling. A postaccident examination of the airplane did not reveal any preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the engine that would have precluded normal operation. Examination of the autopilot system revealed a loose screw inside the pitch servo housing. The screw was one of two that secured the high wattage resistor to the solenoid housing. Observed corrosion within the screw threads was consistent with the threads not being engaged in a nut or other internally threaded feature. No mechanical damage or arcing was visible on the screw. The operational impact of the loose screw is unknown. The pilot’s instrument flying proficiency could not be determined. According to log records, the pilot last flew 4.5 months before the accident. The airplane was in instrument meteorological conditions when the pilot stated that he was trying to recover from the unusual attitude. The pilot did not follow prescribed procedures for an autopilot malfunction. Weather data indicates that the airplane most likely encountered turbulence and icing conditions during the flight; however, the airplane was equipped with an ice protection system. Although ethanol was found during the toxicology tests, the levels varied greatly among the tissue/fluid samples. The investigation was unable to determine if the presence of ethanol was from ingestion or from postmortem production or contamination. The detected level of diphenhydramine, an over-the-counter sedating antihistamine used to treat allergies, was above therapeutic levels and likely contributed to the pilot’s inability to recover from the unusual attitude.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Unknown or undetermined during enroute (climb to cruise) defining event
  2. Loss of control in flight during enroute (climb to cruise)
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence › (general) › Not specified
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to structural icing › Not specified
  • factor Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Recent experience › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Auto flight system › Autopilot system › Not specified
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained
  • factor Personnel issues › Physical › Impairment/incapacitation › OTC medication › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Clouds › Effect on operation

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: glider
  • Flight time: 2,078 hours in all
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 2,466 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, March 15, 2010; 27 hours since
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Cont Motor TSIO-520-C(1) (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Teemark CORP

The flight

  • Departed from: AIT Aitkin MN at 3:30 pm
  • Destination: BMT Beaumont TX
  • Flight plan: IFR

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 110° at 8 knots
  • Visibility: 4 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 400 ft
  • Temperature: 37°F (3°C), dew point 36°F (2°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.43 inHg
  • Observation at 3:45 pm from ANE, 48 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N9103N the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2000-01-11NYC00LA066 · accident near Bradford, PA · substantial damage · no injuries

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number CEN11FA133.