The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN11FA007 · Final report

Piper PA-32R-300 accident near Naperville, Illinois, October 6, 2010

On October 6, 2010 at about 5:04 pm local time, a Piper PA-32R-300, registered N3402Q, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff near Naperville, Illinois (Naper Aero Club Aero airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to abort the takeoff when he realized the airplane was not attaining sufficient takeoff and climb performance. Contributing to the accident was the airplane’s partial loss of engine power due to an obstruction of the fuel servo air inlet by the intake duct coupling and ingestion of exhaust gases from a preexisting hole in the exhaust pipe. Also contributing to the accident was the improper annual inspection of the airplane by the owner and two mechanics.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
October 6, 2010 · about 5:04 pm local time
Place
Naperville, Illinois · Naper Aero Club Aero · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA-32R-300 · all PA-32R-300s on the register
Registration
N3402Q · no longer on the register · serial 32R-7780310
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During takeoff, the pilot rotated the airplane beyond the airplane's takeoff ground roll distance and at a speed near the airplane’s stall speed. A witness saw the airplane climb with a nose-up pitch of about 20 degrees. Although the airplane had experienced a partial loss of engine power, as reported by the pilot, it was still able to climb while in a high pitch attitude and corresponding high drag attitude, which is indicative that the airplane had excess horsepower to climb and sustain flight at higher airspeeds and lower angles of attack. However, the pilot continued to attempt to climb rather than to abort the takeoff, exceeded the necessary power requirements, and was unable to sustain the climb; the airplane impacted a building. Postaccident examination of the airplane’s engine revealed a detached fuel servo air inlet coupling that would have perturbed or restricted airflow to the fuel servo, which resulted in the reduced engine power. The examination also revealed a preexisting hole in an exhaust pipe near the fuel servo that would have allowed hot exhaust gases to flow into the fuel servo air inlet, which would also result in reduced engine power. The airplane had undergone an annual inspection performed by the airplane’s owner and two mechanics with inspection authorizations 3 flight hours before the accident flight; the inspection should have identified the detached coupling and the hole in the exhaust pipe.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (partial) during takeoff defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during initial climb

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Lack of action › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Climb rate › Not attained/maintained
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › Maintenance/inspections › (general) › Not specified
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Power plant › Air intake › Incorrect service/maintenance

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,141 hours in all; 6 in the last 90 days; 4 in the last 30 days; 1,089 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: September 29, 2010
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,343 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, September 22, 2010; 3 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,600 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-540-K1G5D (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: Naperville IL at 5:04 pm
  • Destination: AGC Pittsburgh PA
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 36, 2,575 ft by 30 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 270° at 8 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 41°F (5°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.11 inHg
  • Observation at 5:05 pm from LOT, 8 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.