The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN10CA100 · Final report

Cessna P172D accident near Cedar Rapids, Iowa, January 18, 2010

On January 18, 2010 at about 1:50 am local time, a Cessna P172D, registered N8584X, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (IFR final approach) near Cedar Rapids, Iowa (Cedar Rapids airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's continued visual flight into instrument meteorological conditions and his failure to maintain a proper glidepath during the approach. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's lack of instrument proficiency.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 18, 2010 · about 1:50 am local time
Place
Cedar Rapids, Iowa · Cedar Rapids · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Cessna P172D · all P172Ds on the register
Registration
N8584X · no longer on the register · serial P17257184
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The non-instrument-rated pilot received a preflight weather briefing and delayed the flight as instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) were forecast for his route of flight until 1200. The briefer stated that the ceiling at the pilot’s destination airport would probably be 2,000 feet overcast at best later in the day. At 1600, the pilot departed without obtaining another weather briefing, and received flight following during the course of the flight. The pilot reported that while en route he was going to stop for fuel; however, the destination airport was IMC so he decided to continue. Upon reaching his destination he discovered that the weather was IMC, so he diverted to a nearby airport, where he requested emergency assistance. The approach controller offered the nearest visual flight rules airport; however, the pilot stated that he did not have enough fuel to get there. The pilot informed the controller that he had practiced instrument landing system (ILS) approaches during a flight review. The controller gave the pilot vectors and a frequency for an ILS approach. The pilot stated that he attempted to fly the glideslope, but that he became confused as to whether he should climb or descend in order to center the glideslope needle. The airplane contacted the terrain about 2 miles east of the airport and sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and wings. The pilot had a total of 4 hours of instrument flight time.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. VFR encounter with IMC during enroute
  2. Controlled flight into terrain or object (CFIT) during approach (IFR final approach) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Clouds › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Fog › Effect on operation
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Weather planning › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
  • Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid level
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Below VFR minima › Decision related to condition
  • factor Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Total instrument experience › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 840 hours in all; 600 in this make and model; 12 in the last 90 days; 12 in the last 30 days; 775 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: November 3, 2009
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection, December 4, 2009; 9 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,400 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Cont Motor O-360-A1A (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: RVS Tulsa OK at 10:00 pm
  • Destination: AWG Washington IA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: night, dark
  • Wind: from 290° at 10 knots
  • Visibility: 0.5 statute miles
  • Sky: vv
  • Temperature: 28°F (-2°C), dew point 28°F (-2°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.89 inHg
  • Observation at 1:52 am from CID

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number CEN10CA100.